Having trouble reconciling these two things, any thoughts?
-
Why did the house not vote to open an impeachment investigation to allow for official subpoena power?
-
Why did the house not allege any impeachable offences in their filing to the senate?
Thank you for this.
-
If they are attempting to protect themselves from prosecution (which I believe is true), how did their strategy protect them?
-
Your thoughts on the Senate flipping in allowing other evidence/testimony to be introduced? Or were the doors for this already kicked open in house manger testimony to have the defense bring enough to the public purview?