>>7905854

Agreed and well put. Not only have anons put in a lot of time digging and coming up with their own conclusions but Q’s initial posts are pretty clear that the attack wasn’t about MUH SCANNERS.

Also don’t forget the witnesses dying in car wrecks, apparently planning to come forward as a group to contest the official story.

And the conventions coincidence that Saudi nationals trained in combat were in Las Vegas that week for an expo.

This was /lb but I found it intriguing. Links Khashoggi to Las Vegas. https://youtu.be/ySXzlgdR4fU

>>7906024

But what you’re missing is that THERE WAS NO GREAT PUSH FOR SAUDI ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY THEORIES. THE MSM stayed the hell away from any of that, going so far as to say, “who cares if Paddock has a motive?”

>>7906165

Top kek.

>>7906188

True but what did they provide as motive to killing Khashoggi? It was all about MUH PURSECUTION of journalists. Nothing else.