Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 4:45 a.m. No.7908702   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8708 >>8714 >>8728 >>8743 >>8814 >>8842 >>8878 >>8914 >>8944 >>9007 >>9041 >>9063 >>9142 >>9284

I didn't see this in notables….

 

NSA published their Semi-Annual Report to Congress and it says this about "Five Eyes" and Criminal investigations….

 

The reports and reviews issued by the OIG during this reporting period address a broad spectrum of Agency programs and operations. These include reviews in which we identified significant issues and made recommendations for improvement in areas ranging from the Agency’s controls to ensure proper integration of personnel from Second Party, or “Five Eyes,” countries to the Agency’s management of its weapons and other sensitive assets, to its compliance with the rules related to the handling of Congressional identity information in its intelligence reporting. The OIG’s oversight also includes inquiries and investigations into misconduct by Agency affiliates and related to its programs and operations. During the 6 months covered by this SAR, the OIG Investigations Division fielded 558 new contacts (an increase of over a hundred from the prior reporting period), resulting in the initiation of 75 inquiries and 37 investigations (both substantially

increased from the prior period as well). We also referred 33 cases involving Agency personnel

to NSA Employee Relations for potential disciplinary action, and the Agency took such actions

against 29 individuals during this period based on misconduct substantiated by the OIG. During

this period, we saw two Agency contractors enter guilty pleas in federal court to criminal conduct

in cases investigated by the OIG, and '''we have several other criminal matters pending with the U.S.

Attorney’s Office.'''

 

I'm still reading…

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 4:53 a.m. No.7908728   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8766 >>9142 >>9284

>>7908702

NSA OIG report cont'd….

 

Robert Storch Chairing a New CIGIE Committee "Emerging Technologies" where they are exploring the use of AI for oversight

 

Q told us #2230

"Panic in DC re: Baker confirmed? Note IG involved. Huber >IG (Horowitz) >> storch Q"

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 4:59 a.m. No.7908743   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8814 >>8842 >>9142 >>9284

>>7908702

MOAR on NSA OIG report….

 

They performed an audit on 'FIVE EYES' that doesn't appear to be published yet (SEE PIC) BUT…

 

"The Mission and Mission Support Branch performed an audit of NSA’s Internal Controls Over

Second Party Integrees. In this audit, we identified what the OIG determined to be a risk of

improperly integrating Second Party, or Five Eyes personnel into the workforce, and potentially

impacting relationships with these critical partners. "

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 5:17 a.m. No.7908814   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8842 >>8858 >>9142 >>9284

>>7908702

>>7908743

MOAR on the Audit of "Five Eyes"

 

Highlights:

-No standard processes in place to establish and staff "Five Eyes" positions

-Can't account for all "Five Eyes" positions

-Can't account for all "Five Eyes" personnel

 

NICE!!!!!!

 

Audit of NSA’s Internal Controls Over Second Party Integrees

The concept of exchanging personnel and information with NSA’s Five Eyes (FVEY) partners

dates back to a 1946 United Kingdom – United States Agreement. According to NSA policy,

Second Party integration should be beneficial to the United States Cryptologic System mission,

strengthen relationships with Second Party Nations, and be consistent with U.S. Government law,

policy, strategy, and interest. The OIG conducted this audit to determine whether the internal

controls over the integration of Second Party personnel into the NSA workforce are operating

effectively and efficiently. Our audit revealed that because NSA policy did not assign overall

responsibility to one organization, there were no standard processes in place to establish and staff

Integree positions, and the Agency cannot account for all Integree positions or all Integrees across

the enterprise. Additionally, we found that not all Agency personnel had an understanding of

Second Party Partner relationships; as a result, some Integrees reported having experiences that

are not beneficial to the mission or the Second Party relationship. The Agency agreed with the

OIG’s findings and recommendations, but not with the OIG’s assessment of the resulting risk of

improper integration. The OIG made 13 recommendations to assist NSA in addressing the

deficiencies identified in this audit.

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 5:27 a.m. No.7908878   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9142 >>9284

>>7908702

MOAR on the NSA OIG report…

 

OK this one's interesting….I'm an auditfag

 

A qualified opinion is NOT a clean audit

 

Hightlights:

-They contracted an external auditor

-The audit was re: financial services NSA provides to another Gov Organization….WEIRD

-The audit opinion was QUALIFIED - see PIC2 for explanation

 

"We contracted with an independent public accounting firm to perform an examination of NSA’s

description of its system supporting the performance of financial processing services on behalf of

another U.S. Government organization for the period of October 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019,

and the suitability of the design and the operating effectiveness of controls to achieve the related

control objectives stated in the description. The examination noted certain exceptions, including

with the design and operating effectiveness of controls, which resulted in a qualified opinion. "

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 5:38 a.m. No.7908944   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9142 >>9284

>>7908702

MOAR juicy tidbits from the NSA OIG report…

 

AUDITING THE AUDITORS!!!!

 

Oversight Review of NSA’s Restaurant Fund and Civilian Welfare Fund

The overall objective of the oversight review is to determine whether the '''audits performed by an

independent public accounting firm''' of the financial statements of the Restaurant Fund and Civilian

Welfare Fund for the years ended 30 September 2017 and 2018 '''were performed in accordance

with Government Auditing Standards and the terms of the contract for nonappropriated fund

instrumentalities audit services.'''

 

Q said

 

WHO AUDITS?

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

 

As an auditfag, this is a signal to me that auditors are RUBBER STAMPING AUDITS!!!!

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 5:52 a.m. No.7909007   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9142 >>9284

>>7908702

MOAR NSA OIG Report….

 

They are studying the controls around the 'surveillance' targeting system.

The objective of this review is to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and effectiveness of a targeting

system’s control framework to ensure targeting complies with NSA’s SIGINT authorities to

protect U.S. person privacy.

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 5:59 a.m. No.7909041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9142 >>9284

>>7908702

MD US Attorney has NSA OIG cases pending! SEE PIC

False claims regarding a contractor employee/contractor company/agency employee….

 

A case referred to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland in October 2017 involving

allegations that a contractor employee fraudulently charged the Agency for hours not worked is

pending resolution.

 

A case referred to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland in June 2017 involving allegations

that a contractor company provided unqualified labor in support of an agency contract is pending

resolution.

 

A case referred to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland in July 2018 involving allegations

that an Agency employee colluded with an Agency contractor to overbill the government is

ongoing.

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 6:04 a.m. No.7909063   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9142 >>9284

>>7908702

PAIN 23….

 

"Twenty-three cases referred by the OIG to ER (Employee Relations) from this and prior reporting periods are

pending action."

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 6:17 a.m. No.7909142   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9238

>>7908702

OK all done reading NSA report

-Can't account for "Five Eyes" positions/personnel

-MD US Attorney has pending cases

-NSA has at least 1 unclean audit

-Auditing the Auditors

-23 Employee Relations investigations pending

 

BAKER HERE IS BUN

>>7908702

>>7908728

>>7908743

>>7908814

>>7908878

>>7908944

>>7909007

>>7909041

>>7909063

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/APR-SEP%202019%20OIG%20SAR.pdf

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 6:40 a.m. No.7909276   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9356

>>7909258

>But I don't think we have anything to do with adding to any sealed indictments.

Some anons here might have something to do with the sealed indictments

 

As several whistleblowers have complained….they aren't being told anything while all of this is being investigated.

 

Unlike the BullSchiff show….real investigations are kept secret.

 

Q drops are the only clues given to everyone including the whistleblower/s

Anonymous ID: ca3db7 Jan. 25, 2020, 6:44 a.m. No.7909312   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7909289

"Our case against….."

 

It's habbenin…..this doesn't sound like a typical statement made by a Defendant

 

usually…."our defense case" "our defense"