going over it on c-span
commentators seem to think it went better than I did.
Maybe because it's all old news to me.
And many of these people had no idea? Never heard it before?
Trying to poke holes in Sekalow
POTUS didn't turn over Whistleblower complaint?
Using doubt to claim more witnesses are needed.
Resolution of doubts need witnesses and documents.
? What
They are digging their own grave?
He ended by saying he wants all the data / info
Save that clip
will be great later for a side by side.
call in from New York City
"We knew him. For years. His life was an open book"
Call in to cspan
"How can we have a fair Senate trial when based upon an illegal investigation"
Incoherent Dem on there now
"Want to use Mueller to say there was no collusion. "
"It' was not about collusion . but conspiracy"
Dem sounded under stress, mental case
Schumer
makes case for witnesses.
on now.
I guess they want to drag it out.
be careful what you wish for.
"Why shouldn't we have witnesses and documents."
Schumer fucked up
"It wasn't about with holding military aid , it was about wanting a meeting"
"They made us stronger"
Officials c-span lets to speak are all shills
"Process is like Russia"
I guess they suppose ? what.. .
Just arguing for short term?
All call ins were for POTUS.
But officials grab the mike
Unfair process on C-span.
Merkley is losing it. Talking gobblety gookd
Full Senate never authorized the investigations.
Third in a row, "Attacks on Vindman"
all trump haters are given voice.
interesting.
c-span cut the mic. She was talking about the necessity to respect and honor Vindman (over and above the POTUS?_)
Officials c-span lets to speak are all shills
"Process is like Russia"
I guess they suppose ? what.. .
Just arguing for short term?
All call ins were for POTUS.
But officials grab the mike
Unfair process on C-span.
Merkley is losing it. Talking gobblety gookd
Full Senate never authorized the investigations.
she and mccursed?
link?
Nadler speaks
Says Potus has an litigation to respond ot subpoena just like everyone else
False
Also claims good process is un necessary for fairness. As thought good process is irrelevant.
False.
Claims they want to safeguard the Country but have no evidence of Trump causing danger, except to themselves.
Anybody having trouble with the feed?
Schiff is now trying to insinuate via hostile questions vis a vis what they accuse.
All insinuation. "We have to keep this open to prove POTUS guilt"
So they admit they have an a priori conviction that POTUS is guilty
So they project that wrongful assumption onto Trump
"should have an opportunity to ask questions"
Just admitted Whistleblower had only second hand information