This tactic serves as a great 'counter' to the Dims sneaky move to push the WH opening to dead air Saturday morning.
I can imagine the calls @jack is receiving to 'Shut it down!' and then thinking 'Maybe we can paint this move as a rolling political campaign ad to "Keep Trump in Office" and to "Keep Trump on the 2020 Ballot" and ban them for that reason. Anons can yuck it up at such a bizarre argument but you can be damn sure that 'Mad Max' and her ilk are using it.
Fuck that. The last thing I need is to listen to that corrupt schmuck "Baghdad Bob" spin another lie trying to confuse and muddy the perfectly crystal clear waters. It'd be like getting 'snake bit'.
>Philbin has a soft and serious tone that was very effective.
Agree anon. Despite the his 'Mr. Rogers' milquetoast first impression, his soft, well organized and stiletto-like presentation was outstanding. The type of guy whose whisper-like delivery everyone in the place first ignores, then before you know it, you can hear a pin drop as everyone strains to catch his every word.
As for the other, I was a bit disappointed that though the point was strongly made that @POTUS was concerned with corruption WW as it related to U.S. economic aid, the Constitutional argument wasn't really emphasized that discretion over the release of appropriated funds lies solely within the Executive Branch during the allowed window. Just as Biden would have been allowed if he actually had good cause to withhold instead of his criminal quid pro quo.