>And 15% check in for “updates," but from the "news,"
And there is the worrisome aspect.
> HRC = Alice
Should brush up on drops before making an ass out of yourself while shilling.
You call yourself a planefag? You’re going on about a C-130 thinking it may be the plane HRC was on and then say no, a different AW. The plane in the HRC pic is a C-17, not a C-130. Going for 30 or 40 posts this bread?
Notable
>>7919829 POTUS tweet with links to subject matter.
Well done anon. POTUS tweet reply with all significant links
Baker
>>>7919559 Illegal Surveilance
This is some random twat with zero sauce referenced. Should not be a notable imo.
It’s some random fag on twat stating an opinion. There is no sauce referenced. Why would we include some random twat opinion in notes? That makes zero sense. What’s the rationale for it being in there other than last baker left it for you?
Great point