Anonymous ID: 5ce497 Jan. 26, 2020, 9:41 p.m. No.7927554   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7580

>>7927485

Doesn't look like this tail number has been used on any other aircraft. If it had, normally there would be another field below it on this view showing the "deregistered" aircraft.

 

https://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=72EX

Anonymous ID: 5ce497 Jan. 26, 2020, 9:45 p.m. No.7927573   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7927531

Interdasting. Normally the FAA is very particular about what you can install on a certified aircraft. You can guarantee that there are several regulations surrounding it.

 

The picture I saw earlier today with the thing being almost completely black, I wonder if that was just done for static display and removed prior to its next flight.

Anonymous ID: 5ce497 Jan. 26, 2020, 9:51 p.m. No.7927600   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7615

>>7927580

>cosmetic vinyl wrapping that would have burnt and shriveled away due to the fire

I have a hard time believing FAA regulations would let it fly in that condition, being covered in a flammable substance.

A complex paint job on a bird like that would probably be in the neighborhood of $100K. It sounds like a lot, but compared to the costs of maintaining and operating such an aircraft, it really isn't.

Anonymous ID: 5ce497 Jan. 26, 2020, 9:59 p.m. No.7927638   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7660

>>7927615

You're right. It definitely seems to be a thing. From what I'm reading, it also seems to be extremely durable. If that's what is in the pic when it was black, I wonder why it came off?