Anonymous ID: 89b437 Jan. 27, 2020, 12:18 p.m. No.7931891   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2051

Can you imagine, how the world works?

Maggie Haberman writes an unsourced article, and now it will influence impeachment?

Life is stranger than fiction.

Anonymous ID: 89b437 Jan. 27, 2020, 12:27 p.m. No.7931989   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2003 >>2005

>>7931931

Jane at the table with Rudy and Jay, courtesy of that fucker Parnas.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7901529/Lev-Parnas-photos-reveal-extraordinary-access-Trumps-family-associates.html

Anonymous ID: 89b437 Jan. 27, 2020, 12:46 p.m. No.7932189   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7932111

Trips confirmed.

FISA court is unconstitutional.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

 

Hops from target are invalidated by the fourth amendment.

 

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."

 

Still can't figure out how one can justify the FISA court with any part of the 6th amendment