>>7933340

>>7933356

Point to something specific or go back to discord.

>>7933376

Honestly, it's a bit boring, but I loved the "why not" statements. Pam did great too!

>>7933362

>starting

Besides some opinion and anchors, FOX is the other neocon side of the otherwise neoliberal MSM. Don't be fooled my dude!

I hope someone puts together a video of the three of them breaking off coverage. Maybe a split screen with the three of them and CSPAN, with all of them going dark at just the right time

From cuckchan. Anyone want to do that project?

>>7933447

I mean, reactions to the impeachment trial are somewhat notable. What I've seen done is putting them all into a bun to be honest. It's not pretty, but I don't see it as being wrong or meaning the 'baker is comped'.

Just tell the baker this instead of attacking him.

>>7933468

It would make a graphic vid.

>>7933483

Neither, just have lurked moar.

>>7933679

>timestamp = post number

when did this meme start?

>>7933685

Keep us posted.

>>7933725

No, I meant equating the numerical timestamp or delta to a post number. It's not a confirmed means of comms; but people keep posting it. Theoretically it's cool I guess, but completely unconfirmed.

>>7933350

>>7933821

This. This is a very important topic and needs to be dug into.

Also CRUUUUUUUUUZ!!!

>>7933858

K E K

Genuinely laughed.

>>7933881

It's a cool theory though, not at the level of a proof imo.

>>7933954

It's technically privileged, whether or not it's classified. But yes most things are if not all of them.