>>7933602

> is this were the biblefags tell us God uses sinners for the good work, never the good, why be good if God can't even use good for the good? what good is good for?

Your point about Barr's preexisting credibility likely being lacking is valid.

Beyond that you appear to just be a anti-God rant.

How many 'good' guys that you would like have the inside connections and trust to do what Barr has maybe done? Good guys don't have inside knowledge to be leveraged.

It's a shame you are so ignorant of the Bible and it's contents. There was a guy originally called Saul . . . .

>>7933621

One theory claims he has already been tried and executed.

If cloning really is as common as it appears it may be, he may already be at GITMO, dead or alive.

>>7933829

>That tells you there is physical evidence of their crimes

And/or so nobody can confirm or deny the actual (perpetually fluctuating) body count.