https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KCF9My1vBP4&t=1m20s

VP Biden literally bragging about a quid pro quo to stop a major Ukrainian investigation into the Ukrainian company his son Hunter Biden is working for.

Fast forward…

Trump asks - in line with the standing treaty - for cooperation with US attorneys about the standing of the case that got shutdown (not legal closure). Trump gets accused of quid pro quo.

Clearly its not, but for sake of silly argument lets pretend Trump did. If it was ok for VP Biden, why is not ok for P Trump?

10 people are placed in a room - you are 1 of them.

1 fabricates a lie accusing you of doing something ‘bad’.

The social dogma plays out, a moderator is selected, you are forced to select 1 as a defense counsel. The accuser takes counsel as well.

That consumed 5 of 10 people, leaving 5 left as a jury. Your justice is now left to a majority among 5.. or 3 people.

So if 4 out of 10 pre-agree to falsely accuse you of wrongdoing - you are guilty. Welcome to the true nature of socialism.

1 - you - thinks you are innocent

2 - the person who accused you - thinks you are guilty

3 - the ‘moderator’ - purposely selected as the ‘most honest’ person in the room - who would logically think you are innocent

4 - your selected counsel - thinks you are innocent

5 - your accusers counsel - purposely selected as one who would likely believe you are innocent

6,7,8,9,10 - your jury - of which 3 were in on the accusation before it was made.