>>7935800 PB
>How can alan dershowitz, who represented Epstein, voted Clinton and Barry, who seems to be very observant, knowingly vote and side with obvious evil?
Keep in mind, we can fall prey to "assumptions" ourselves, and always need to check ourselves.
Put the following Q posts together, and it's clearly possible he falls into a rather broad group of people similar to those Q told us were set free by President Trump, the night of the first state of the union.
Q10
"Again, good people were forced into bed with this evil under personal and family threats. Could you live with yourself helping to cover up such evil despicable acts if given a safe way out? " - Q
Q1132
>Thank you Alan.
>Welcome aboard.
>Freedom
Not everyone standing next to Epstein would want to be standing next to Epstein once they learned what Epstein was about. And it is absolutely the case that as a lawyer, you can get caught representing people you absolutely live in horror of, but, you will lose your license if you refuse to represent them.
But, what if what you learned, also means you "know too much?"
SO, given tonight's performance by this professor who obviously loves our Constitution, mebbe we ponder before we assume.
Great job tonight Professor Dershowitz.
Turning our Constitution into a simple two branched parliamentary system, by lopping off the executive branch is the scariest thing about this whole trial.
Yours was a true Clarence Darrow teaching moment.
You made this law graduate proud.