>>7945594

>no free speech on the call

I don't understand that - can you explain?

>no adam shift present for impeachment committee

Do you mean he wasn't present in the H judiciary committee? He is intel, not judiciary, so… ?

>>7945718

>>7945754

>>7945670

<free speech on call

>shouldt a prez be able to say what he wants within range tho.

I don't think that's a real issue

<no adam shift present for impeachment committee

>i thought he did not present himself to the house, his staff did.

Was Schiff required to present himself to the House Judiciary committee for some reason?

What event are you referencing here?

I would like to help with memes, but these 2 are still confusing

>>7945843

see >>7945842

>>7945933

checked

>>7946064

Alright, ty for the answer - you're still doing great!!

I'll work on some.