The Making of A Pandemic

Remember the Swine Flu scare of 1976, when the U.S. government warned the country that Swine Flu, transmitted from pigs to people, could be a pandemic killer? Washington decided that everyone should take the vaccine to prevent a nationwide outbreak. Soon after, four thousand people out of forty-six million sued the government for $3.5 billion resulting from negative health effects from the vaccine. If hindsight is 20/20, then such a fraud could not possibly happen again, could it?

The Hegelian Dialectic

People have short attention spans. Since the Swine Flu (H1N1) fiasco of 1976, the media has created several opportunities to raise the level of fear against invisible viruses. From SARS to H5N1 (Bird flu), experts claim these viruses could possibly be transmitted from animals to humans, including pigs, poultry, snakes and bats (coronavirus), but they do not know for sure. Allegedly, these “severe acute respiratory syndromes” can only be controlled by vaccines.

At the same time, vaccine mandates have been beta-tested on several populations, including healthcare workers, the elderly, and children who attend public school in California and NYC, with little resistance. Has the fear of pandemics been a distraction from mandates, the removal of rights, and the end of a free society?

By connecting the pandemic dots, it becomes easy to see the Hegelian Dialectic of “Problem-Reaction-Solution” playing out, by design and by disclosure, but not by coincidence. That is; as long as people buy into the propaganda and allow it to transpire.

On January 24th, 2020: the first scare of the Wuhan Coronavirus, a SARS-like virus, was reported out of Wuhan, China. The first cases were declared in China, the day before The Year of the Rat. Rats are known for spreading viruses. All mainstream news media were reporting 26 people had been confirmed dead from the virus.

On Jan 25th 2020: China confirmed 38 cases of the coronavirus, worldwide, outside of mainland China, on the Chinese New Year, the Year of the Rat, and Lunar New Year.

Timeline: Building the Story

In July 2015, a U.S. patent for “an attenuated coronavirus” (SARS-CoV) was filed, and subsequently granted in November 2018 to the CDC. According to a summary of this patent, this attenuated coronavirus was designed to be used as a vaccine…

The present invention provides a live, attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene encoding polyproteins comprising a mutation in one or more of non-structural protein(s) (nsp)-10, nsp-14, nsp-15 or nsp-16. The coronavirus may be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease, such as infectious bronchitis, in a subject.

February, 2017: China’s very first biosafety-level-4 lab is located just 20 miles away from where this outbreak supposedly originated. The Wuhan lab cost 300 million yuan (US$44 million). An article published in the Journal Nature reported that this lab would be “studying the pathogen that causes SARS”. The article also noted that the SARS virus “has escaped from high-level containment facilities in Beijing multiple times”… See Michael Snyder’s dot-connecting article Just A Coincidence? for more details.

Scare tactics do one thing well; they distract us from something more insidious. In our time, the making of a killer pandemic is a distraction as freedoms are lost. If this Playbook is allowed to play out, humanity could be looking at a world where A.I. calls the shots, and inherent rights are a thing of the past, if they ever were a thing at all.

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2020/01/the-making-of-a-pandemic.htmlRemember the

Fox stonewalls pro-life group from running ‘abortion survivors’ ad on Super Bowl Sunday

The pro-life group claims the network gave them the ‘runaround’ for six months.

January 28, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – The pro-life group that created the powerful abortion survivor TV ad played at the March for Life last week is calling out Fox Sports Network for stonewalling them and refusing to approve their ad to run in a slot on Super Bowl Sunday this coming weekend.

Faces of Choice, a new non-profit whose ad featuring 14 survivors of abortion was shown at the March for Life, say they have been “given the runaround” by the network for six months.

The ad, which features the faces and stories of abortion survivors, is designed to raise awareness of the survivors of abortion who all univocally make it clear that they are persons and not a "choice." Faces of Choice applied to run a 30-second version of the ad. The ad doesn’t mention abortion. Faces of Choice says it has been carefully produced so that it is appropriate for the Super Bowl audience.

Lyric Gillett, founder of Faces of Choice, told LifeSiteNews she has invested thousands of dollars and hundreds of working hours after the network approved her storyboard for the advert months ago.

Gillett told LifeSite that the application was originally made in July, but that over the following months, members of the Fox legal department made a series of further inquiries without ever approving the application. Gillett said that they had answered every question the legal team asked and provided all necessary documentation.

“We were one of the very first people to submit anything to them. We met every single stipulation that they asked for and every time we met the line they moved the line further to request something else,” Gillett told LifeSite.

Gillett says that she was initially advised that they would be informed if the application was successful in October 2019. But no answer was given. “We were told over and over again ‘you’re going to get an answer’, but we never got anything,” she said.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fox-network-stonewalls-pro-life-group-from-running-abortion-survivors-ad-on-super-bowl-sunday

Trump Admin Says Israel Has Accepted Plan for Palestinian State

Israeli leaders have agreed to a framework for a Palestinian state that would see the new country more than double in size with its capital located in Eastern Jerusalem, according to information provided by the White House.

The Trump administration unveiled on Tuesday its long-anticipated plan to achieve peace between Israel and the Palestinians. The plan, which White House officials say has already been agreed to by Israel, would see the Jewish state freezing for four years all construction in contested territories that could be used to form a new Palestinian state.

Under Trump's plan, a Palestinian state "will more than double the size of the land currently used by the Palestinians" and include areas in Eastern Jerusalem. Jerusalem will remain Israel's capital city and under its control, according to the White House.

"Israel has now agreed to terms for a future Palestinian State," the White House announced in informational materials outlining the peace framework. "Israel has agreed to a four-year land freeze to secure the possibility of a two-state solution."

"President Trump secured agreement from both Prime Minister Netanyahu and opposition leader Lieutenant General Benny Gantz to come to Washington, where they agreed to use this Vision as a basis for negotiation," the White House wrote in the latest materials outlining the new plan. "For the first time in this conflict, President Trump has reached an understanding with Israel regarding a map setting forth borders for a two-state solution."

Under the plan, which has already been dubbed dead on arrival by leading Palestinian factions, "Jerusalem will stay united and remain the capital of Israel, while the capital of the State of Palestine will be Al-Quds and include areas of East Jerusalem."

"Beyond territory, the Vision provides for Palestinian use and management of facilities at the Haifa and Ashdod ports, Palestinian development of a resort area on the north shore of the Dead Sea, and continued Palestinian agricultural activity in the Jordan Valley," the White House materials continue.

The plan envisions a scenario where "neither Palestinians nor Israelis will be uprooted from their homes," though it remains unclear how this goal will be achieved on the ground.

The White House emphasized portions of the plan that focus on protecting Israeli security interests. To this end, unlike past proposals, the plan "does not ask Israel to take additional security risks and enables Israel to defend itself by itself against any threats."

U.S. ambassador to Israel David Friedman told reporters the plan marks "a huge advancement in the peace process."

https://freebeacon.com/national-security/trump-admin-says-israel-has-accepted-plan-for-palestinian-state/

Ahum…..we have decided what you can have for your state!

Coronavirus Virus- Is Motive Profit or Depopulation (or both)?

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation co-hosted a pandemic exercise in late 2019 that simulated a global coronavirus outbreak.

They also just happen to fund the group who owns the patent to the deadly virus and are working on a vaccine to solve the crisis.

On June 19, 2015, the UK government-funded Pirbright Institute filed an application for a patent for the live coronavirus, which was approved on Nov 20, 2018.

Suspiciously, a Pirbright Institute "primary funder" is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Specifically, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donated $189,232 to the Pirbright Institute in a 2013 grant looking "to improve our understanding of, and effective use of, current control tools and measures (including vaccines) against peste des petits ruminants and foot and mouth disease, two serious diseases affecting livestock that are widespread in developing countries."

Then, in November of 2019, the Pirbright Institute's website published an article focusing on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's funding of "a Livestock Antibody Hub" to the sum of $5.5 million.

Outbreak Emanates From Chinese City With Controversial Lab

The deadly virus, called the Wuhan coronavirus based on the Chinese city it emanated from, comes just years after a controversial lab was opened in Wuhan to work with the world's most dangerous pathogens.

As of January 15, the virus made its way to America with a man carrying the illness from Wuhan, China to Washington state.

Now, a report out of Texas on Thursday claims officials at the Brazos County Health District are investigating a suspected case of the coronavirus.

At the time of writing this article, the death total has reached 25 and the estimated number of people infected with coronavirus in Wuhan is around 4,000.

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Look To Develop Coronavirus Vaccine

But don't worry, the same globalists who own the patent to the virus and predicted its rise are "scrambling to develop vaccines for the deadly Wuhan coronavirus."

According to Business Insider, "A coalition backed by Bill Gates is funding biotechs" who are attempting to develop a coronavirus vaccine.

Is this illness being intentionally spread so governments worldwide can join forces in the name of stopping the virus, or so groups like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation can step in and become saviors, or is it all just a massive coincidence?

The good news is internet users are wise to the activities of the Gates' and the global elite's depopulation agenda.

https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/01/-coronavirus-report-keeping-it.html

“Technoference”: Why We Should be Worried About Parents’ Screen Time

Many young people spend significantly more time using screens than is recommended by health professionals. Excessive screen time has been blamed for several ills, including obesity and poor mental health. To mitigate these negative effects, we need to understand the things that encourage children to spend lots of time in front of a screen.

Children learn and develop their behaviour by watching others, especially their parents, and this includes screen use. In fact, the types of devices parents use and the length of time they use them for are the strongest predictors of their child’s screen use and screen time. Parents also control the availability of screens and technology and set the rules on their use.

Distracted parenting

Although parents are responsible for setting the limits for their child’s screen time, the demands of the modern world – and work and home-life duties – can make it difficult for parents to switch off and limit their own screen time. The constant connectivity that mobile phones allow makes it increasingly difficult to manage and can result in distracted parenting.

While it is thought that parents spend more time with their children than in the past, the quality of the interactions is thought to have decreased. In a study from the US, parents of children aged 5-18 reported spending slightly less quality time with their kids than they spend on their phones.

Sociologists, media theorists and technology experts have argued that digital technology is distracting us, resulting in negative social and emotional consequences. While we know that parents’ screen time influences their child’s screen time, we know less about the consequences of distracted parenting because of screen time.

“Just a minute” is a common phrase heard by children, and many parents admit to spending too much time on their phone while with their children. The effects of such phrases have led social scientists to coin the word “technoference” to describe how technology interferes in social relationships, including the most important relationship of all: the one between parents and their children.

Parents’ technoference can have negative consequences for babies and young children, including impaired emotional well-being, parents missing bids for attention, less positive interactions, poor child behaviour, delayed language development and an increase in child injuries.

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2020/01/technoference-why-we-should-be-worried-about-parents-screen-time.html

https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1222269245393862662