>>795539

>Which notables are missing anon? Let me know of any we missed adding back in, and I'll add.

Just before the breads started blowing up, an anon posted stuff on decoding Q posts. Some method involving the number 77.

>>795628

>>>795603 (You)

>If you can find it again, I'll be happy to add it.

Bread 982

>>791886

5:5[y]

>>795921

>There are still anons over on the shill baker bread.

Not sure if it's notable, but the other bread has tweets from dotcom winning his case. His code might be a way to replace YT.

>>796006

Nice list of notables, Baker.

Here's a fresh baker babe for the archives.