Anonymous ID: b69f67 Jan. 28, 2020, 6:47 p.m. No.7949609   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9624 >>9714 >>9813 >>0055 >>0087

1.

 

In Guantanamo testimony, CIA waterboarder says he threatened to cut throat of 9/11 mastermind’s son GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba

 

The man seen as the architect of the CIA’s enhanced interrogations program, who personally waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, threatened to cut the throat of the alleged 9/11 mastermind's son if another attack occurred inside the United States.

 

Mohammed, 55, was dubbed “KSM”and described as “the principal architect of the 9/11 attacks” in the 9/11 Commission Report. The man who waterboarded him, Dr. James Mitchell, who was hired by the CIA in the wake of the al Qaeda terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000 Americans, sought to defend his actions during a two-week-long pretrial military court hearing in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

 

“I said that if there was another catastrophic attack in the United States — one — and I find out about it — two — and you had information about it — three — and another American child died — four — I will cut your son’s throat,” Mitchell testified on Monday, claiming he sought legal advice from a CIA attorney known in court only as “PJ1” before threatening the captured terrorist.

 

Mitchell, 68, dressed in a dark suit with a white shirt and a blue and silver tie, claimed he was advised that “if it was a threat of imminent harm then that would not be legal” but a “conditional threat” would be — and he emphasized the four conditions in the threat he made to Mohammed.

 

The admission seems to match a heavily redacted section of a 2004 CIA inspector general report stating that “an experienced agency interrogator reported that … [redacted] interrogators said to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that if anything else happens in the United States, ‘We’re going to kill your children.’ … With respect to the report provided to him of the threats, [redacted] that report did not indicate that the law had been violated.”

 

The 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee report on the CIA’s interrogation program also includes a reference to the incident and seems to indicate that the CIA attorney who gave Mitchell the green light worked for the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center and “later told the inspector general that these threats were legal so long as the threats were ‘conditional.’”

The Senate report states that “according to the CIA interrogator, during KSM’s first day at Detention Site Blue, Swigert and Dunbar first began threatening KSM’s children.”

 

Detention Site Blue is believed to be a CIA black site in Poland. "Swigert" was a pseudonym for Mitchell, while "Dunbar" was a pseudonym for Mitchell’s business partner, Dr. Bruce Jessen, who will testify later this week.

“Dunbar had nothing to do with this,” Mitchell said from the witness stand, slipping into calling him by his codename after repeatedly calling him “Dr. Jessen” for a week.

 

Mitchell testified that his motivation was to "stop them from killing thousands of other people,” and “the bulk of Americans are grateful for the sacrifices that Dr. Jessen and I took to keep them safe.”

David Nevin, a gray-haired and bespectacled defense attorney for Mohammed, grilled Mitchell about his actions while Mohammed, dressed in a white tunic with a camouflage jacket and dyed-red beard, followed closely from the defense table a couple dozen feet away.

 

Mitchell disputed the notion that the threats to Mohammed’s children began immediately upon Mohammed's arrival at the black site in early March 2003, after being captured in Pakistan days prior. He blamed the alleged falsehood on a man known in court as “NZ7” but referred to by Mitchell as “the preacher,” a man he says was an “acolyte” of “NX2,” also called “the new sheriff” by the CIA psychologist.

“This was one of the new sheriff’s acolytes who was working to move me out of the interrogation process,” Mitchell testified. “This man exaggerated some aspects of this.”

 

In his testimony, as well as in his 2016 book Enhanced Interrogation, Mitchell outlined a rivalry with “the new sheriff” and condemned what he saw as abusive treatment of detainees by him and those the man trained.

Mitchell, Jessen, and “the preacher” waterboarded Mohammed together.

Anonymous ID: b69f67 Jan. 28, 2020, 6:48 p.m. No.7949624   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9813 >>0087

>>7949609

 

 

During roughly three weeks in March 2003, Mohammed was subjected to at least 15 waterboarding sessions totaling at least 183 water pours across his mouth and nostrils. He was also bounced off a flexible wall and subjected to facial slaps, attention grabs, stress positions, standing sleep deprivation for 6 1/2 days, and other harsh interrogation methods.

“I had every reason to believe that it was legal,” Mitchell said of waterboarding. “If it’s illegal, I’m not going to do it.”

 

He said the methods were approved by the president and were briefed to the National Security Council, approved by the Justice Department, briefed to Congress, and that the method followed the military’s Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape program. Mitchell said during his testimony that he didn’t want to violate the conventions on torture.

Mitchell said the threat to one of Mohammed’s two sons came at the end of the waterboarding sessions, not before, when the CIA psychologist wanted to transition the terrorist out of enhanced interrogations and “into full debriefing mode."

 

“When we moved from EIT's to no EIT's, I wanted an emotional flag” for that moment, Mitchell testified. He chose as his flag the “conditional” threat against Mohammed’s child.

“It is, in retrospect, distasteful. … He killed eight children in the Sept. 11 attacks,” Mitchell said to Nevin, who kept pushing the CIA psychologist on whether he had intended to scare Mohammed.

 

“I would hope that he would fear killing children,” Mitchell said, adding, “that was the only time I made that threat to him,” and “he threatened to kill my family,” too.

“Look over there,” Mitchell said, turning his gaze to Mohammed. “He’s smirking.”

 

“Do you understand that threatening that would instill fear?” the presiding judge, Col. W. Shane Cohen, eventually jumped in to ask.

“Yes, I do,” Mitchell answered.

 

But Mitchell denied other accusations level at him.

Nevin again referenced the Senate report that stated that, after one interrogation session, “the detention site personnel hung a picture of KSM's sons in his cell as a way to [heighten] his imagination concerning where they are, who has them, [and] what is in store for them.’”

 

Mitchell said this was not true and blamed the false claim on the “new preacher” — mixing his nicknames for “the preacher” and “the new sheriff.”

“We didn’t have a picture of his sons. … This is the first time I’m reading this,” Mitchell said. “The entire crew would’ve been sent home if we’d hung pictures in his cell. I will be 100% responsible for the things I did and 0% responsible for the things I didn’t do."

Nevin asked Mitchell whether he’d threatened that Mohammed’s interrogations might last for half a century.

“Didn’t you write the number 50 on the inside of Mr. Mohammed’s cell?” the lawyer asked.

“Absolutely not,” the CIA psychologist retorted. “First I’ve heard of it. If we’d heard of someone doing that, we’d have sent them home.”

 

In his sessions with Mitchell, Mohammed confessed to the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Later, he admitted to planning assassination plots against presidents and a pope and is suspected of taking part in other terror attacks. Those include the 1993 World Trade Center bombing that killed six people, Richard Reid’s “shoe bomber” 2001 attempt to blow up an airliner, and the 2002 Bali nightclub bombing in Indonesia that killed 202 people.

 

Mohammed, a close ally of al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden, is being tried in a death penalty case alongside four co-defendants. These include his nephew, Ammar al Baluchi; alleged 9/11 hijacking trainer Walid bin Attash; 9/11 facilitator Ramzi bin al Shibh; and al Qaeda money man Mustafa al Hawsawi. The defense teams are seeking to throw out confessions the five men made to FBI "clean teams" at Guantanamo Bay.

During the Monday proceeding, Nevin asked about Mitchell's interactions with the alleged trainer, Attash. “Did you point to the blood on the walling wall and tell Mr. bin Atash it was Mr. Mohammed’s blood?” Nevin asked.

 

“No, I didn’t talk to you about that stain on the wall. No,” Mitchell said, directing his comments to bin Attash directly. “I don’t know whether it was blood. It was a stain on the wall.”