Court challenge? Bench ruling by the Chief Justice on the spot? Dersh would probably have mentioned it if it had ever happened before in history.
>>7950233 Not totally. Need to hydrate or something.
Holy shit!
>Are there any High IQ Constitutional Lawfags in the bread tonight?
>How are four jurors with the clearest of Conflicts of Interest be able to sit on a trial in the Senate and be considered impartial by their peers?
You mean the 4 who were alleged to have received campaign contributions from–
Who tweeted that? Was it Eric something?
They have tweeted it multiple times over the past few days. If you have the tweet, post it here please.
not the lawyer you are seeking