>>7951523 (LB)

>What is the explanation for two (or three or more) anons having the same ID?

Either it's a fast posting bot or a glitch in the site's code.

IDs are hashes of posters' IP addresses and a salt value (unknowable to us for security). Wildly speculating, If something went wrong in the step where the IP data is passed to the hashing function (like if Ron recently monkeyed with it in attempt to allow Tor users to have different IPs...) and only a null value was passed then it would hash to the same value. It reminds me of debugging code and quickly learning to recognize that hashes starting with "da39a..." were empty strings.

>>7951722

>>7951730

>>7951757

It's obviously botty. But it sometimes reacts when anons talk about it. So it probably has a (very bored) human operator who supervises.

>>7951832

>>7951846

Do you think embedding music is a motherfucking game?

>>7951965

>claims it can cure malaria and that is what it was used for by this researcher.

I have no doubt he did. The next breakthrough is for the patient to survive…

>>7952128

>https://twitter.com/arslan_hidayat/status/

Link broken

https://twitter.com/arslan_hidayat/status/1221838122402578432

>>7952134

Kek. No, NN is never the better sauce.

>>7952151

>Chlorine Dioxide solution

Is this for curing bad breath?

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Chlorine-dioxide

>>7952187

*Sprinkle borax around the rim.

>>7952238

The behavior of Dems and Reps in this sage is not what I was expecting. The Reps want to get it over with quickly; while the Dems want to drag it out with witnesses.

Q implied that Pelosi is trying to use it to cause disruption to Senate business. But Q also seemed to hint that it's a great way to introduce evidence. And the enemy reads Q's drops too.

I'm having difficulty fitting all this into a coherent model.

>>7952258

>sage

*saga

>>7952293

>Thoughts?

We haven't found anything genuinely spoopy about any of this. We only have our default cynical skepticism.

The question of why the wreckage was not black was answered quickly when we realized (after about 20 minutes) that cosmetic vinyl wraps exist.

>>7952320

>Did these people pursue impeachment based on information they "knowingly" knew was false.

Yes. But there is enough subjectivity in interpretation of the Zelinsky call and the withholding of aid that they they could wriggle out of it by claiming that the 'genuinely' believed their incorrect perceptions. Ourguys would have to nail them to the wall with intercepted comm in which they admit, in no uncertain terms, that they KNOW that it's all crap and they are really engaged in a coup. And it would practically need to be in those words to dispel any reasonable doubt from the other half of the population. That's a tall order.

They can't actually be dumb enough to communicate that electronically when they know the NSA is lurking. It's fun to say "these people are stupid.' But they can't be THAT careless.

>>7952320

>We are secretly forcing a number of people to become actors and betray allies in order to avoid the death penalty. The leadership are being forced to play the role of judas goats

And this has a ring of truth to it. But I don't haven't seen this 'movie' before to be able to picture how this would play out or enough info/experience with this to grasp how it would be executed. It's simply not in my range of conception. I think this is why I don't understand what I'm seeing.