>>7954795

shoop isnt even a defense for fake or real. you cant even see faces well enough to determine identity. pic related.

>>7954759

>>7954844

BWAHAHAHAHA confirmed fake. how could these faggots fall for something so obvious, then famefag it for a week without a simple web search to confirm. fucking kek.

https://tineye.com/search/b3d5b6b659c44471108acf1ff0dfdbec6543b89d?page=1

>>7954932

>>7954881

found thumbnail here

http://www.6gayvideos.com/best/91.html

link to vid is kill

http://www.6gayvideos.com/tube/black-cock-for-daddy.html

WORST DIG EVER

>>7955392

>are/our

>>7955398

Does this mean the leaker (Vindman 2.0) leaked "classified" info to NYT? Q was right. these people are really stupid.