Repost
>>7967114 [lb]
WATCH THIS
twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1222950125179371522
The White House
There are many questions and concerns about the alleged whistleblower and potential conflicts of interest.
Democrats aren't answering any of them.
twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1222947025928577024
@ 17
>There are many questions and concerns about the alleged whistleblower and potential conflicts of interest.
The White House
Adam Schiff has claimed that he didn't have any contact with the whistleblower, only his staff.
But questions about the extent of possible consultation have been totally shut down—and the Inspector General's testimony remains a secret.
twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1222950822117609473
Mark Meadows
How about this:
If the Senate discusses calling witnesses, and Adam Schiff continues demanding we block questions and testimony on the whistleblower… then Adam Schiff should testify
twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1222949125081194496
Given Chief Justice John Roberts' censorship of a senator in the discharge of the senator's duties, the following question must now be posed on the floor: In the event a chief justice were impeached for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, who would preside over his trial?
twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1222954784447258628
Paul Sperry
ALERT! —-→
twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1222962441522380806
Mark Meadows
Democrats were just asked if they had evidence administration officials were involved in a quid pro quo scheme. They AGAIN cite Gordon Sondland.
Yes, that’s this Gordon Sondland.
The guy who admitted he had “no evidence” beyond “presumption.”
twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1222961400735248386
Absolutely. Put John Roberts in the dock and ask him why he refused to disclipline a FISA judge who refused to disclose his relationship to a corrupt FBI agent running the case. Why did he allow the court he oversaw to rubber stamp fraudulent warrants?
twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1222958655668215808
Can we add John Roberts to the witness list? I mean, he appointed the judges who authorized the unlawful warrants to spy on the Trump campaign. In fact, why isn’t he recused on that very basis? The IC IG worked for the agency that submitted all 4 applications to the court…
twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1222957908155097088
Read The Question About Eric Ciaramella That Chief Justice John Roberts Just Refused To Read
>Read The Question About Eric Ciaramella That Chief Justice John Roberts Just Refused To Read
Sen. @RandPaulreads the question that was declined by Chief Justice Roberts.
twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1222969830568939520
>Sometimes I think Rand is the only one that really cares.
TDSers are getting #ArrestRandPaul trending on Twitter
twitter.com/search?q=%23ArrestRandPaul&src=typed_query