Kek this is a good one…
Q's post on SC has made me realize why the WH attorneys are arguing the way they are. I've been irritated that they haven't pounded on the Dems making the ASSUMPTION that Trump's actions were ipso facto evidence of seeking "political gain." (They've gone into that, yes, but nearly enough for my taste). But I've also been scratching my head why they haven't dove extensively into Wilkinson v. U.S. which makes the subpoenas invalid…perhaps because that would be the entirety of their case before the Supreme Court when the impeachment is challenged.
Keep giving them the rope!
Unfortunately, there have been a lot of people who have blasted him for differences with POTUS..but note Trump has never knocked Rand, and in the most critical moments, he's been Trump's greatest defender.
More Ron Paul people should sit up and take note. Rand knows something….