lawfag here
NOT notable
already dug on and posted earlir
it is UNLAWFUL under a variety of federal laws to reveal the name of a whistleblower and that is why roberts did not do so
note that Fitton's opinion is based on his statement that CIAmarhsmallow is NOT a "real whistleblower"
this is some misleading shit
turley actually got it wrong - watch for correction
lawfag is done now
ps - its easy to dig this yourself
duh
he filed the papers and qualified (for now) under existing law
yeah it corrupt but so what
takes action and effort to undo that
> Fitton's opinion on the matter is relevant and notable.
and i agree with that since he DID qualify his opinion that there was NO whistleblower protection FOR THAT REASON not cuz it doenst exist in the law
roberts knoew in advance the name and that he planned to NOT announce it as it is unlawful to do so UNTIL the WB is outed under one of the exceptions in the law OR agrees to it