Sen. Lindsey Graham…

Question: …an experience with the President discussing what he described as a quid pro quo, why not hear from John Bolton to describe that?

Graham: I can assume the following. That the President suspended the aid for a period of time to make sure the Bidens were looked at by Ukraine and that the Ukrainians would look at allegations of election interference to 2016. Uh, what is being clear to me in this trial that there's every reason in the world to want to look at Hunter Biden's conduct. That the public purpose that we're talking about is that when Joe Biden, my friend, stood up in front of the Ukranian Parlement and said "the time for sweet heart deals is over in the energy sector", his son receiving three million dollars from Burisma undercut that message and that will be pursued outside of impeachment, that to me is a legitamite point of inquiry even if you assume the facts most favorable to the government. And this is not a crime, this is a partisan impeachment and I'm hoping a few democrats will say…I don't like President Trump, I don't agree with his policies, but we should never do this again because the House in Republican hands, trust me, could do the same thing and I may find myself in a position of where partisan impeachment comes to the Senate involving a Democrat, uh, I hope I would rise to the occasion.

Question: What do you base your increasing optomisim that you'll block witnesses?

Graham: Everybody believes that there's a scintilla of evidence that the Biden's were involved in uh, uh, business practices that undercut US foreign policy interests in the Ukraine. The manager said, this is a hoax that's been debunked, it hasn't, if there's not a scintilla of evidence I would argue if he can find a scintilla of evidence then it makes the President's concerns reasonable, non-personal, and all you need to do is show a public motive, not an exclusively or solely personal motive. I buy what Dershowitz is saying.

Question: Have you heard that there's fewer than four votes?

Graham: I think that, I think Mr. Dershowitz has convince poeple that you can assume the facts, as you said, most favorable to the government, and still find that the evidence would suggest there's a scintilla of reason b…..(video cuts off).

>>7973557

>>7971981 pb

Possibly, the 4 scintillas that Graham mentioned

Are 4 Democrat votes in the Senate

That join with the Republicans

To make it a bi-partisan acquittal of Trump

4 bright sparks of light

Undiscovered stars

It still would be 4 BOOMs

That just demolish 4 years

Of partisan hammering on Trump

>>7972094 pb

>>7973591

Scintilla means spark

Sen. Lindsey Graham says the word 4 times.

At 2:20 in the video there is a stair step pattern

Of 4 steps in the bricks

That makes me thing of this mirrored revolver.

BOOM.

BOOM.

BOOM.

BOOM.

A WEEK TO REMEMBER.

DARK TO LIGHT.

BLACKOUT NECESSARY.

Q

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

What if there is important evidence

In regard to corrupt American politicians

That the DOJ learned illegally?

That makes it Fruit of the Poisonous Tree

And it cannot be used in a court of law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree

For instance, during illegal surveillance of Trump

One of the bad guys basically admitted to corrupt illegal acts in Ukraine

Knowing that Trump's DOJ cannot use this at all

And that Poroshenko's people can be trusted to block all investigation in Ukraine.

And then…

Zelenskiy wins

And Pompeo comes for a visit

Fruitful trip, I trust…. Kansas?

In the film…

Dracula Untold (2014)

The most powerful of the Dark Ones

Unveils the light, in order to destroy them all

Except…

He knows the secret of true immortality

Is this how the Cabal is being destroyed?

By a senior figure high up the pyramid

Who shed light on everything

And even though he died in Green's helo…

This is NOT a game

P.S. that line, this is not a game actually was uttered, meaningfully by the lead actor. You really are watching a SCRIPTED Movie, as The Plan that was made a long time ago, unfolds…

>>7973857

The secret to immortality as used by the Illuminati

Is revealed in Avatar (2009)

And in The Skeleton Key (2005)

In the Tibetan Book of the Dead

And in the Egyptian Book of the Dead.

It really is possible for a person to transfer their soul

Into another body, and avoid death

For a while, anyway.

The Dalai Lama does this so that the same soul who was the first Dalai Lama

Now resides in the body of the current one

Makes you wonder who Heinrich Harrer really was.

Surname has 6 letters, one twin letter, and the R occurs 3 times overall

Was he a powerful magician working for the Nazi occult society

To learn the secret of immortality?

Maybe the European technique

Of bonking the Matriarch on the head to kill her

And then breathing in her last breath

Was not all that reliable?

>>7973893

The film…

Jupiter Ascending

Was not so much about immortality

But about cloning

Jupiter was born with the identical DNA of a wealthy but dead Queen

And it was only the social mores or the laws of their society

That bequeathed the Queen's possessions to Jupiter

Based on a DNA match.

The TV series Andromeda had something similar

Tyr Anasazi out of Victoria by Barbarossa

Was a Nietzschean, bred for strength and genetic purity

He steals the mummified remains of Drago Museveni

Who is Progenitor of the Nietzschean race

Then he has the DNA in all of his cells modified to match Drago

So that he can claim to be the Second Coming of the Progenitor

And unite the Clans into one force.