there is no way you would introduced it 'legally' in a sham political event.
it will be introduced legally when GEn Flynn sues the fed asking for the release of ALL DOCS, INCLUDING FISAS AND EMAILS.
LEGALLY IN A REAL TRIAL THAT IS LEGAL
> So will Romney
I DON'T see any news reporting on Romney.
he said he would like to hear from Bolton but he didn't say he would vote for witnesses.
murkowsk is FREED, right?
>Exactly. This shit can't be given anymore legitimacy. At first I wanted witnesses, but it's gone on for too long.
if it's not legit, you must acquit
she was getting death threats if she didn't vote yes
I imagine romney is getting death threats if he votes yes.
I thought Lisa was freed
CNN panel is saying it is over with a 50-50 tie.
Romney and Murkowski have no reason to vote yes for witnesses when they are in a red state.
So why would they vote yes, only to end in a tie?
what purpose would a yes vote serve them?
Mitch had collins say yes first because she is a blue state and nees D votes.
then he had Lemar go second with a no vote because he is retiring and it doesn't matter.
so I guess lisa an mitt will vote yes to save their seats in red states.
yes there was but i don't have it