Anonymous ID: 9f4edd Jan. 31, 2020, 2:52 a.m. No.7976102   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6119 >>6125 >>6286

>>7976098

I get that and I even thought about getting the book a time or two but I couldn't justify spending that money for language games that the people in charge don't play.

 

Anyone can make up a new way of speaking and claim a title. Look at Sealand.

 

It's less that the language needs to changeโ€ฆ more people's approach to honesty.

I don't want to speak something as cold and excruciatingly dull as chinese.

Anonymous ID: 9f4edd Jan. 31, 2020, 3:04 a.m. No.7976129   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6138

>>7976119

but then we're back to honesty and acknowledging that legalese is just ways of hiding dishonesty in a language format that no one else can understand but are yet held accountable to.

 

For example, why do we use Black's English instead of Common English? So why replace one shitty situation with another?