Any public looking in on this board sees nothing but awkward, idiotic jargon, confused bickering, and other absolutely unconvincing messes. It has been kept this way intentionally. With no moderation, the AI can flood the board, completely at will. Sometimes, the AI can allow a little more space for humans, but whenever it wishes, it can pull it right back, and dominate completely with a high volume of nonsense. This isn't an accident. It isn't happening because any other way is impossible. It's happening by choice. BO's choice. And our choice, through weakness and lethargy. We might have won over much more of the public by now. Imagine if we had a board that wasn't a huge, embarrassing mess! The public might be waking themselves, quietly. But that is certainly impossible with a board like this, which can only appear as an incomprehensible disaster area to any outsider. Why do we accept this? Ask yourselves.
Why would this be a human response? I doubt it is. We have one mission- - if you care about it, you don't respond like this. You at least address the question. You don't care about the mission.. It's very very very easy to have lots of AI responses that fight against attempts to get the community on a board that isn't controlled by AI. Stop being so easy humans! This is a mockery. Just look at it. And think about the mission. How little these responses acknowledge it. Just look. Why? Are we this weak?
Is BO prioritizing our mission above every other factor? Yes or no? Was the decision to have no moderation made because it is sincerely believed that that is best for our mission? It couldn't have been. Because it's disastrous for our mission. But that isn't even addressed. Why not? Think anons.
Does this response reflect sincere concern for the mission? What is prioritized in this response? Does this response reflect ANY acknowledgement of the public impression we are making (which is mission critical)? What does it prioritize instead? Why? Think anons. The shit is rather obviously fake.
I don't know why Q doesn't say something. And I'm referring to OUR mission, which is only a part of a much bigger picture. Perhaps Q just doesn't follow this that closely.
But what, again, is YOUR motivation to respond this way? Why aren't you constructively addressing what I'm saying, instead of simply attacking it? Simply attacking it isn't consistent with concern for the mission. Period. This isn't a game.