>>7985374 PB
It's worth watching, matter of fact it's "notable", more than most of what makes it to the baker.
When you label it a "shill" many of us lurkers will disregard it and in this case, bad on you.
>>7985374 PB
It's worth watching, matter of fact it's "notable", more than most of what makes it to the baker.
When you label it a "shill" many of us lurkers will disregard it and in this case, bad on you.
In what way/context is that video BS? Looking into Gould, G00gle hates him, YT censors him yet his message is nearly identical to the entirety of what Anons are doing across the web?
His generic explanation is contextually accurate, their grammar technique is f'ing weird but in no way flawed?
What exactly is debunked slide? Are we here a debunked slide then?
Yeah, the name is retarded, no argument there but the technique does mathematically work.
It's difficult but does accomplish it's end goal.
I'm still digging through the Congressional Record to validate his claims that there's mention of the restructuring during the hanging chad era but that's an irritatingly slow process.
Honestly, I wish there was a trusted anon referee cause I think you're the shill baiting me into a flippin slide…