Quantum Laws from >>77986708 earlier tonight EO
based on >>7985960 from bread #10221
from video:
SERGEANT ROBERT HORTON - WAR CASTLES Overview YT
https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ368/PLAW-115publ368.pdf
Quantum Laws from >>77986708 earlier tonight EO
based on >>7985960 from bread #10221
from video:
SERGEANT ROBERT HORTON - WAR CASTLES Overview YT
https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ368/PLAW-115publ368.pdf
So I have an idea. We are the news NOW, right? So we should be anonymously organized by this point in time, by state.. We should establish several threads named by STATE, and post our inquiries and the responses to our inquiries to congress on why they are doing what they are doing (good vs. evil) and have a central place to post and collect all of the direct, passic=ve, and non-responses from our representatives and senators. It's time to step up our game and record what they are doing, in real time. Different board for each state, and each state gets a collective repository of responses. Am I getting over the target and focus?
I thought about that. I like your thinking anon. I think this could become a major part of the awakening. if (((they))) do or don't respond, it still speaks volumes and provides a record. Thanks for your input!
You are on the same path as me. I know the idea is god but the problem comes in with the "No outside comms" vs. being the news now. I don't want outside coms. Just some sort of repository like Qmap.pub that works toward our mission. I've been drinking so I will start a thread to further this discussion and pull it out of General. Seems like there is some interest here. Thanks anon (and all anons).
I have the Murkowski factor. Hard to tell what's going on because anon wonders if she has had a moment or if she has been freed. I just know that logging the congressional comms in a local place by crowdsourcing will be Yuge.
You send a question, you report it. You get an answer, you report it and attach it as answered.
You don't get a response, you report it and attach it to your question as unanswered.
That's how I see it, I just don t have the construct yet but will develop it because the interest definitely seems to be there.
Thank you for your input anon.
thanks anon. I'll look at it as I think about this.
A little history 1/?
A little history 3/?
A little history 4/?
I hope so. I'm looking for the rest to post rn. Plus GA anon also did the Newsweak covers back in the early days, and I'm trying to find those to post as well.
Why has the media not tied Jerry's race to the mic with his absence thismornig due to the "wife's pancreatic cancer"? Not a soul has reported about the correlation of the two things.
Lord, remind our congressmen that they cannot "get over" on you and "get over" it. Remind them that they will answer to your will at the end."
Now with tha Q'sโฆ
3/?
4/?