Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 4:44 a.m. No.7989003   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9027 >>9279

Was slid last bread. The video containing what appears to be Adam Schiff is 100% Notable. It IS Adam Schiff. A bunch of shills got on a bandwagon and said it was a nothingburger.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 4:52 a.m. No.7989046   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9488 >>9638

>>7989034

Watch the video on repeat.

Watch the impeachment hearings of the snivelly little fuck.

That is fucking Schiff.

Either you're all shills, or your fucking eyesight is going. I watched the video at least 50 times. Even compared it.

No mistaking it, even the way the faggot's legs move as he waddles forward like some sort of prehistoric pedovore

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 4:54 a.m. No.7989059   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7989048

Baker, no denying this is notable. Please add THIS post to the notables. As it has increased resolution, and you can make out Schiff's retarded bug-eyes alot easier here

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 4:59 a.m. No.7989095   🗄️.is 🔗kun

There is a large shill effort to distract/dissuade from the fact that Schiff met with Ciaramella in the Mp4 posted last bread, and this bread. Anons use your better judgement and watch the video for yourself a few times. The way he walks and his distinct panicked bug eyes give him away

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:02 a.m. No.7989110   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9142 >>9187

>>7989096

You can fake faces, you can't fake the way that faggot moves his legs and his body. Unless you're implying it's a different person entirely and EVERYTHING was edited, in regards to face, clothes, mannerisms, the way he walks ect.

 

You glow shill fag

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:04 a.m. No.7989122   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9142

>>7989118

Can shill all you want you moronic pedovore faggot.

Anons aren't retarded enough to not be able to discern the difference for themselves. It's notable. Sorry your day's ruined.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:07 a.m. No.7989137   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9164

Board split 50/50 on whether or not Mp4 has Adam Schiff and Ciaramella. When added to notables baker, be sure to include that we aren't 100% "Sure" it's Schiff and Ciaramella to appease the shillfags, please

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:09 a.m. No.7989149   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7989142

Honestly I dont give a fuck if you filter me, or whatever your shitty personal belief is. I'm spreading information and combatting people attempting to bury said information.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:19 a.m. No.7989219   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9242 >>9282 >>9348

>>7989207

I can't help what retards do? Nobody with any actual brain capacity is saying it's two men in one man's body? This is literally a nonsensical slide argument. All that was said is it's a video of Schiff MEETING him, not crossdressing as him? You're a fucking psycho my dude.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:21 a.m. No.7989229   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9239 >>9241 >>9244 >>9249

>>7989221

Do you have a problem clicking the video and using your own eyes/judgement? It's literally there, plain as day, for anyone to see.

If you deny it, you're a shillfag, it's literally Adam Schiff's pedo walk and bug eyes. You shills are going to have to try alot harder. It's not just me who thinks it's notable. It's most anons.

You glow

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:25 a.m. No.7989258   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9274 >>9711

Anons, Baker, im leaving, as i've already taken 20 posts of the bread, and I try to refrain from doing that often. Please, use your own judgement. Please, follow your gut. There is a shill attack ongoing towards anybody who thinks that the video contains Adam Schiff and Ciaramella. If 50% of anons are saying it's notable. It's notable, even if debatably so.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:50 a.m. No.7989394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9401

>>7989389

Really? Because there's no sauce proving it ISN'T Adam Schiff, just a bunch of glowniggers yelling as loudly as me.

Leave it up on notables, let anons decide as the day goes on.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:52 a.m. No.7989405   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9409 >>9429

Guess it's not Schiff guys. Guess it's just a guy who looks 98% like Schiff IN THE SAME BUILDING Schiff is supposed to be in.

Total coincidence.

Nothing burger.

Take this out of the notables immediately.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:53 a.m. No.7989416   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9421

>>7989409

Oh really? Because you know what date this video was taken? And what suit and tie he was wearing specifically on said date? Can you give me the frame in the 10 seconds of video you can see his "fat neck" at a good angle?

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 5:56 a.m. No.7989436   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9444

>>7989432

So again, you can't give me the date the video was taken? You can't tell me what color suit/tie he was wearing on said date, and you cant give me sauce proving it's 100% definitely not Schiff, correct? K fag, thanks for playing.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 6 a.m. No.7989462   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9480

>>7989453

>21 posts to my 29 posts

>Shilling against video containing Adam Schiff

>Telling ME I don't blend in

The perfect camoflauge.

Im not trying to blend in you autistic boomer, im trying to stand out to get more people to see Adam Schiff meeting with Ciaramella

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 6:03 a.m. No.7989491   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7989480

>Looked at his chin, not Schiff

>Yelling it's not Schiff w/o watching video

>Hypocritically attacking anons who say it IS Schiff

And this is critical thinking?

Im just letting you know, you can go prolapse and bleed out you shill faggot cuck.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 6:06 a.m. No.7989506   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9511

>>7989505

>23 posts dedicated to saying it's not Schiff

>loads of other shills on bandwagon

>want it removed from Notables even though it's not confirmed, and still up for debate.

>no debate allowed

>no proof it's NOT Schiff given

Glow harder, you're making me warm daddy

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 6:08 a.m. No.7989513   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9536

>>7989511

Actually it did work? Because enough anons think it's Schiff that it's in notables.

Shame.

If you come up with counter evidence though, and figure out it's not Schiff? I'll be happy to pull a John Mcaffee and eat my own dick.

Anonymous ID: 8d152d Feb. 1, 2020, 6:10 a.m. No.7989524   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7989518

Oh look, how to properly approach something you dont agree with

>Leave in notables let anons decide

not

<Remove from notables 100% confirmed is not schiff nothingburger