Anonymous ID: c30f27 Feb. 1, 2020, 5:04 a.m. No.7989119   🗄️.is đź”—kun

A date on the video would be helpful. If it was taken yesterday, it’s not Schiff. Cross referenced suit/tie colors. However I’m almost certain that is Ciaramella.

Anonymous ID: c30f27 Feb. 1, 2020, 5:15 a.m. No.7989191   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9213 >>9688

@ first glance reviewing the video I without a doubt thought it was Schiff/Ciaramella. However, logic dictates that Ciaramella has no business being anywhere near this trial if he has a brain and logic dictates Schiff wouldn’t meet that nigga right in front of cameras. He knows we know. We don’t need much more sauce on that video other than the day it was recorded. Once we know when it was recorded we can cross reference Shiff suit/tie during trial with the one in the video. Simple as that. Someone find that fuggin date

Anonymous ID: c30f27 Feb. 1, 2020, 5:27 a.m. No.7989274   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7989258

I can tell by how the glownigger talks that it’s fake, now. Although I’ll admit, at first glance it looks very convincing. Dig moar if yous please but I’ve formulated by opinion. 100% bullshit

Anonymous ID: c30f27 Feb. 1, 2020, 5:36 a.m. No.7989316   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7989305

It’s not Schiff in the video, you can tell by how the Glownigger ruled out all possibilities of it being anyone else and how he talked down on other anons for critically thinking. Schiff isn’t the brightest guy out there but no fucking way is he meeting with Ciaramella out in the open like that.

Anonymous ID: c30f27 Feb. 1, 2020, 5:50 a.m. No.7989395   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9397

>>7989384

Here’s your sauce : C_A agents don’t meet in the wide open when they know we know and they know how much scrutiny they are under. Fuck you, faggot. Get this garbage fucking video out of notables and ruin this glowfaggots day

Anonymous ID: c30f27 Feb. 1, 2020, 6:02 a.m. No.7989480   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9491

>>7989462

We’re arguing apples to oranges I saw how you attacked anons above for critically thinking and I’m just letting you know that you don’t blend in. “Anyone who doesn’t agree that it’s Schiff/Ciaramella is a shill” see how you lose? That’s enough from me. It will be disproven within the next hour. Then you can go fuck yourself

Anonymous ID: c30f27 Feb. 1, 2020, 6:11 a.m. No.7989536   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7989513

Schiff isn’t smart by any stretch but he’s not that dumb. I’m using logic. That’s all. If someone who actually has a Twatter (you) can get in touch with the user who posted it and ask the date it was recorded so you can further prove your side of the hypothesis that could help. I don’t have twatter. If you can prove it’s real I’ll gladly fly to Wuhan and fuck a chicken

Anonymous ID: c30f27 Feb. 1, 2020, 6:36 a.m. No.7989712   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7989692

I’m sorry, spent 25 posts trying to get that video out of notables and arguing with the shill trying to set up this board. Initially I nominated the video as notable, then I did 2 minutes of research. All well. See you next bread, with about 30 less posts on my behalf.