Its obvious to anons that there is a high resemblence to schiff. Only schills are on here trying to make a big deal about it not being schiff.
If there is a high resemblence, then two options.
1) its schiff
2) its someone who looks an awful lot like schiff
Assuming 2 were the case, to put it into hilarys words, what difference does it make? We use it to our advantage anyway and just keep pushing that it is schiff until they prove that it isnt. I havent seen any proof that it isnt schiff, so following their logic…. GUILTY.