Anonymous ID: 6180cf Feb. 1, 2020, 6:59 a.m. No.7989893   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9944 >>9966 >>9969 >>9994 >>0014 >>0020 >>0249

To the people that said the hair profiles did not match that of Schiff in the video >>7989018 (lb), they seem to actually be very similar when viewed from the side. See pics 1 and 2.

 

And to those who said the face does not match:

 

First, the video quality is really bad, there are many compression artifacts. And it seems the person who posted it, used a cellphone to zoom in on what was appearing on a screen.

 

See pics 3 and 4, they are 2 successive frames in the video. Look at the artifacts around the mouth. Try to frame by frame the video, you will see many artifacts like this. Encoding artifacts coming from shitty camera video software?

 

Similarly, to the people arguing that you don't see a bald spot on his head, you actually do see a clear spot in the frames where you can see him from the back. It seems to me that the video is just very low res, and the lightning is bad.

 

Second, compare pics 3 and 5. The 2 individuals look pretty similar to me.

 

Same overall face, same suit style, etc. The neck arguments are not convincing: it the video, he is looking down at Ciaramella, who is short. So it would make sense that his neck does not appear as long as in the videos where he is looking up.

 

source for the Schiff video:

https://www.youtube.com/embed/ToOCKBOPbVg

 

I have no idea if the video is actually legit, but the arguments that were provided to 'debunk' it in the last bread were pretty weak IMHO.

Anonymous ID: 6180cf Feb. 1, 2020, 7:17 a.m. No.7990020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0035 >>0042 >>0048 >>0054 >>0068 >>0077 >>0088 >>0129 >>0130 >>0151 >>0170 >>0174 >>0185 >>0228 >>0302 >>0443

>>7989893

 

I stand corrected. Other anon found the original video.

 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?468708-1/senate-rejects-witnesses-documents-impeachment-trial-49-51%3E%3E7989018

 

NOT SHIFF AT ALL

 

See screenshot. Around 2:18:30, guy is on video.

 

What a scam…

 

Thank you to the anons that stood their ground in debunking the video.

Anonymous ID: 6180cf Feb. 1, 2020, 7:23 a.m. No.7990067   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0081 >>0094 >>0139 >>0170

>>7989969

 

Turns out what I perceived as a potential bald spot in the video is actually lightening from the top of that guy's light brown/blondish hair.

 

I stand corrected on all grounds.

 

No need for your anti-semitic ad hominems though. Video quality of the original was horrible, as I demonstrated with the compression bugs around his mouth.

Anonymous ID: 6180cf Feb. 1, 2020, 8:12 a.m. No.7990438   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7990302

 

I agree, credit goes to >>7989824 for finding the video, which was the most important part.

 

But how would that make me an asshat for using the video and posting screenshots debunking the various claims made before?

 

Also, this is not a fame game here, IDs reset at the end of the bread. Why would you insult the baker and other anons over this?