Anonymous ID: 446af7 Feb. 1, 2020, 1:03 p.m. No.7993708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3741 >>4039

>>7993553

There's a lot of confusing symbology and its done on purpose.

Lizards aren't evil.

snakes aren't evil.

goats aren't evil.

 

Evil-doers used these creations of God and added a story that gave them negative connotations. (inverted/perverted their perceived nature)

 

Does that mean shapeshifters don't exist? I can't answer that. I don't know what I don't know.

 

Satan was depicted as several different things in the apocrypha so the 1:1 association to satan=snake is a little off.

 

Also there's the theory that Satan isn't an actual individual entity but a "human nature" that we have to dominate. Satan means "adversary", so it has a lot of flexibility when it comes to its usage.

 

Same with Lucifer. it originated more as an adjective than an Identifying-noun/name. see pic-related Wasn't until the last 1000 years that Satan's personality was merged with "Lucifer"

 

The farther you dig into these 'grammatical issues' the more the illusion warps. "So, by this definition, am I satan, or are they satan? Am I bad for wanting Truth?" etc etc. They designed it that way to keep you off-balance and confused. the connotation is what influences our emotional response to the data/information. Got to balance that "emotional beast" with the logical one. bring them both into harmony and allow them to work synchronously instead of against each other.

Anonymous ID: 446af7 Feb. 1, 2020, 1:09 p.m. No.7993764   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3886

>>7993712

 

qresear.ch?q=postmaster

 

ignore 'emails' postmaster@state.gov is a no-reply default stuff.

 

We caught the postmaster dig a couple days ago - keep going, The shills do not want it talked about. You can see on the qresear.ch we JUST started talked about postmaster within the last week, yet they will cry "this slide again?"

 

Trying to watch all the videos I can find , here's a couple i have reserved/open in tabs atm:

https://leakproject.com/compartmentalization-programming-global-control-grid/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yGq3XwOIYM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUvur38BuPM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjnYhKhE52M <- for the notice of the death of :David-Wynn:Miller June 22 2018. ( no WAY natural causes! cannot find any record of death elsewhere - fascinating )

Anonymous ID: 446af7 Feb. 1, 2020, 1:52 p.m. No.7994120   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7993808

funny - speaking about a new grammar construct for our language/societal framework, and we can't quite "articulate" what it is.

 

I feel ya. Rather, I feel the overwhelming lack of basic education among our ranks. No blame/no faults - I know i was the freak born obsessed with words and grammar and languages AND a programmer, so I had an odd leg up when coming to understanding this.

 

Let me see how this works for explanation, tell me if makes sense.. ?

 

computers understand binary machine language.

binary means "2", but binary is only made up of 1s and 0s.

 

now, in programming, you got these conditions and comparison operators. you make a comparison, and depending on its state (true/false) perform an action ( or stop performing an action, you choose - INTENT )

 

will try to crash course on comparison/conditions

in lax languages (like common english & PHP), typehinting isn't required, and you can mix types, but it leaves the code(context) ambiguous.

here's why: in lax languages, any variable can have any value. a number, a letter, a word, a math equation, an array, an object. its a placeholder for an unknown value.

language PARSERS go through your code either at runtime or compile, and parses the statements you have written, essentially its a task list. performs operations in an order specified by the programmer, or in a procedural manner ( one right after the other ) When you write something like

$money = 0;

(if ($money)) { print $money; }

the conditional if() will return false because 0 = false in lax interpretation.

 

however, you can write something like this

if (!is_null($money)) { print $money; }

and the parser will evaluate "0 is 0, 0 is a value and not null, so lets print the money"

! is a condition inverter, is_null returns a true if the value is null, if you want a true for "is not null" then you can write !is_null OR if (is_null($money) === false) { … }

 

so the parser parses the 'intention' of the coder: if condition is met, perform action

 

What happens though, if your statements are poorly written? Computer misinterprets intention, and its "not working as intended"…

 

can be quite the PITA when you're dealing with multiple programmers on same team.

 

So in stricter languages, you have to explicitly define that a variable is a Boolean and once that happens it will ONLY accept true/false values ( NOT 0/1). If the variable isn't explicitly defined at the beginning of the code, it errors out and will not compile. So, in this environment, your parser will detect immediately whether not you're following semantics (language construct) and if not, you get told to fuck off immediately. do not pass go, do not collect $200.

 

So what :David-Wynn:Miller did was develop a new parsing style that was mathematically reinforced to prevent any ambiguous interpretations - from computers AND the people. ←- the people can no longer argue opinions/feelings based on "well we're arguing this was the context". the context (typehinting) is defined explicitly in the "code" (legal statements) and therefore cannot be muddled with human's fallible nature.

 

hopfully i made sense to you

Anonymous ID: 446af7 Feb. 1, 2020, 2:08 p.m. No.7994271   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4317

>>7994143

 

POSTMAN

 

POSTMASTER

 

Cmon Q

 

Game is over! We figured it out!

 

We caught all the "planet earth" drops too.

The closest star should be here by now if you left ~ 4 years ago, can you speed in space?

I know we have a space force, but do you get fined for speeding in space?

Anonymous ID: 446af7 Feb. 1, 2020, 2:17 p.m. No.7994336   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7994313

we need to log the flag desecration rules here. tie it with the picture.

I got a bunch of hits from congressional records 1999 re: flag descration