Anonymous ID: d78ebb Feb. 1, 2020, 1:06 p.m. No.7993732   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3762 >>3824 >>3982 >>4049 >>4227 >>4232 >>4325

Professor Zhengli Shi, Senior Scientist and Principal Investigator of Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory.

 

Do you believe in coincidences? Because it just so happens that Prof. Zhengli has been ardently researching and experimenting with coronaviruses for years at Wuhan Institute of Virology — even before ground was broken over a decade ago on the new P4 National Biosafety Laboratory. Interestingly, the scientist seems uniquely perfect for her role — like a “Neo” figure in a laboratory version of The Matrix. In fact, Prof. Zhengli has been Senior Scientist and Principal Investigator of Wuhan Insititute of Virology for the last 20 years, initially starting as a Research Assistant in 1990 before upgrading to Research Scientist in 1993, serving in that role until 1995. Aside from a 5-year leave from 1995 to 2000 to get her PhD at University of Montpellier in France, she’s been at the Institute for an amazing 30 years.

 

Notably, starting in 2014, Prof. Zhengli began to win particularly large sums of grant funding for the express purpose of researching and experimenting with coronaviruses — often receiving numerous, overlapping grants for the same time period. What’s just as interesting is where a lot of this funding originated — the US government. On January 6, 2014, Prof. Zhengli received a US$665,000 grant from the National Institute of Health for a study named The Ecology of Bat Coronaviruses and the Risk of Future Coronavirus Emergence (NIAID R01 AI1 10964) and then four days later on January 10, 2014, an additional US$559,500 grant from the United States Agency of International Development for research studied entitled Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT 2_China (Project No. AID-OAA-A-14–00102).

 

On top of these lucrative American grants she concurrently received similarly significant grants from the National Basic Research program of China, the Chinese Academy of Science, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and from the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences totaling over US$2,500,000 for researching interspecies transmission of zoonotic viruses, the identification, genetic evolution and pathogenesis of bat viruses, the genetic variation of pathogens in Africa, the evolution mechanism of the adaptation of bat SARS-related coronaviruses to host receptor molecules, the risk of interspecies infection, genetic evolution and transmission mechanism of important bat-borne viruses, and pathogen biology studies on novel swine coronaviruses.

Anonymous ID: d78ebb Feb. 1, 2020, 1:11 p.m. No.7993780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3824 >>3982 >>4227 >>4325

>>7993762

 

In fact, on the day before the new coronavirus would find its first victims just 8.6 miles away at the market on December 12, 2019, Prof. Zhengli and her team published the study entitled Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry on December 11, 2019. The abstract reads,

 

“Coronavirus spike protein mediates viral entry into cells by first binding to a receptor on host cell surface and then fusing viral and host membranes. Our study reveals a novel molecular mechanism for antibody-enhanced viral entry and can guide future vaccination and antiviral strategies. This study reveals complex roles of antibodies in viral entry and can guide future vaccine design and antibody-based drug therapy.”

 

And immediately after this study was published — literally the following day — the first victims became infected with what would soon be named Coronavirus 2019-nCoV began to get infected…just a few miles away from Prof. Zhengli’s laboratory. And as The Sun reports, victims of the new coronavirus are infected via a strong binding affinity to a human protein called ACE2,” in precisely the identical manner as Prof. Zhengli’s just-discovered “novel molecular mechanism” identified (or engineered) literally weeks if not days before.

 

Do you believe in coincidences?

Anonymous ID: d78ebb Feb. 1, 2020, 1:34 p.m. No.7993974   🗄️.is 🔗kun

 

In the first paragraph of Carl Von Clausewitz’s seminal work On War he writes …[in war] “more than elsewhere the part and the whole must be always be thought of together (Paret 1976, p. 75).” His words, over a hundred years before the term Complexity theory was coined echoes the common description of complex adaptive systems; “the whole is more than the sum of the parts (Miller and Page 2007).”

 

https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/advancing-intelligence-analysis-for-the-multi-domain-battlefield

Anonymous ID: d78ebb Feb. 1, 2020, 2:05 p.m. No.7994241   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4321 >>4326

>>7993824 [from the Crazy Conspiracy PDF]

 

February 2017 — Inside the Chinese lab poised to study world’s most dangerous

pathogens

“A laboratory in Wuhan is on the cusp of being cleared to work with the world’s most

dangerous pathogens. The move is part of a plan to build between five and seven

biosafety level-4 (BSL-4) labs across the Chinese mainland by 2025, and has generated

much excitement, as well as some concerns.

But worries surround the Chinese lab, too. The SARS virus has escaped from high-level

containment facilities in Beijing multiple times, notes Richard Ebright, a molecular

biologist at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Tim Trevan, founder of

CHROME Biosafety and Biosecurity Consulting in Damascus, Maryland, says that an

open culture is important to keeping BSL-4 labs safe, and he questions how easy this will

be in China, where society emphasizes hierarchy. “Diversity of viewpoint, flat structures

where everyone feels free to speak up and openness of information are important,” he

says.”

 

What if there is a Chinese Deep State

That has been continually sabotaging containment systems at the Wuhan lab, so that when they want to, The can unleash the pathogens on China and the world?

 

Who actually built the Georgia Guidestones?

Only 500 million people? They would have to kill 900 million in just China to even begin getting close to that number.