>>7995790 lb

see >>7995495 lb

pretty big 'coincidence' involving two anons on the board

>>7995573 lb

https://www.scribd.com/doc/134877586/Postal-Treaty-2010-for-the-Americas

PREAMBLE

We have come forth from the Power to Be the Eternal Mystery of its Presence. We are the beginning and the end; the origin and dissolution; the geometry of divinity, and we have remained True to this eternal Moment in the Sun. We are the silence that is unfathomable, and the spark whose voice is the flame of Freedom.We have been called forth to return the Power and we have been chosen, as we have chosen ourselves to Be; to Become that which we have forever Been. Our essence is identical to the Source of its essence. For there was never a time when we were not, nor shall there ever be a time when we shall cease to Be. We are they who have nurtured the sacred fire of illumination; forging our Souls into the image of god on Earth. We are they who have embraced the Ordeal of our descent into matter, and have ascended the 33 steps of the spinal staircase to experience the Rapture of the Quickening. We are they who have faced the great magnification of the All to ascend the ineffable throne of mind and wield the power of self. Our Word is Truth and we are its Issue. Our Word is Law and we are Self-governing. Our Word is Light and we are the infinite Beacon of Eternal I Am.We bear the Light of our ascension and the wisdom of our journey into Matter; thus do we reject the burdens of tyranny by exposing them as the fruits of ignorance. We have drunk deeply from the Ancient Font, we know who we are, and this knowledge is our purpose. Our Sword is Flaming and two-edged, and its name is Awakening. The Mind of Creation is manifest in our Eye, and Its Will in our deeds. We are the Royal Seed of the Source precisely because we are its Pure Light Shining True upon this Earth. Our spirits have been forged in this crucible of sorrow, therefore our joy is boundless; and thus are we recognized by those who have eyes to see.In this eternal moment, and through this Treaty, we do decree I AM; Individual and sovereign Beings, in continual Communion with the Quintessence of Creation. We do hereby claim the right to listen to the voice of god within and to freely choose those with whom we will engage in contract. So here now do we claim our inheritance, Spiritual Sovereignty.

tied to john 3:7 it makes me think birth certificates invalidated, get 'corrected true non-taxable' identity "Born again"

I'd love to have some serious confirmation instead of my gut. I understand if I have to do the whole leap of faith thing though.

and suddenly, it smells like a trap. why?

>>7996041

>>7996050

let's be intelligent beings

we can make a list of 20 questions and vote on them here. be selfless and think of what 'the people' need and not what itch you wanna scratch. We want actual answers and if he can't answer them then he won't. So ask questions we're pretty sure he can answer.

we have GOT to learn to work together better for the new world

>>7996073

ports are the cornerstone

p = c ?

>>7996073

Keyport is an unincorporated community and census-designated place (CDP) in Kitsap County, Washington, United States. The community is located at the eastern terminus of State Route 308 on the Kitsap Peninsula. As of the 2010 census, the Keyport CDP had a total population of 554.[2]

Keyport was named for Keyport, New Jersey, in 1896.[3] Its nickname is "Torpedo Town USA". Situated on a small peninsula jutting into Liberty Bay near Poulsbo, it is the home of a small United States Navy depot tasked with ranging and repairing torpedoes for the US Navy and allies.

Keyport's only church, Keyport Bible Church, was established in the early 1900s and incorporated in 1926. The church's building was dedicated May 2, 1937, and has since added a number of classrooms and a multipurpose building.[4]

Military bases

From the earliest days (pre-World War I), the naval station had a number of names such as Pacific Torpedo Station and Naval Torpedo Station, until in the 1990s when the base was named the Naval Undersea Warfare Engineering Station (NUWES). The land the base sits on was originally a pig farm, which led to some interesting nicknames in the base's early years. As the Cold War drew to a close, a number of budget cuts, two RIFs and several Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) actions caused Keyport's parent command in Newport, Rhode Island, to reserve the engineering function to itself, at least on paper, resulting in a name change to Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Keyport (NUWC). One of many subsequent reorganizations resulted in another name change to Naval Sea Systems Command, Keyport (NAVSEA). Following the US Navy's current trend of aligning base names locally, the current station name is Naval Base Kitsap – Keyport, similar to the other facilities in Bremerton and Bangor. However, the tenant Commands remain as before (NAVSEA and NUWC). Keyport survived all these threats without closing its gates, but the civilian workforce at Keyport has fallen from about 3,500 personnel in 1990 to 1,348 in 2005.

….

hold on now. .. pic related, RSVP

>>7996135

that's what you think

input you put the words together

"keyport"

and then dig.

>>7996121

Keyport is a borough in Monmouth County, New Jersey, United States. At the 2010 United States Census, the borough's population was 7,240,[10][11][12] following a decline of 328 (-4.3%) from the 7,568 counted in the 2000 Census, which had in turn declined by 18 (-0.2%) from the 7,586 counted in the 1990 Census.[21] Keyport's nickname is the "Pearl of the Bayshore" or the "Gateway to the Bayshore".[22]

Keyport was originally formed as a Town on March 17, 1870, from portions of Raritan Township (now Hazlet). On April 2, 1908, the Borough of Keyport was formed, replacing Keyport Town.[23]

Keyport is part of the Bayshore Regional Strategic Plan, an effort by nine municipalities in northern Monmouth County to reinvigorate the area's economy by emphasizing the traditional downtowns, dense residential neighborhoods, maritime history, and the natural Raritan Bayshore coastline.

March 17?

"maritime history" and "coastline"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyport,_New_Jersey

>>7996114

man, ok. think think

extract data govern energy cycle

hack some data from the government about free energy, break the cycle….

ports… computer ports… data transfer.. extract data through ports

what is data?

what is a transmission?

we know Seth Rich extracted data through the ports.

did he steal Free Energy ?

what else did you steal from the DNC?

hillary was a carrot.

where's the cake?

>>7996152

wow you guys. the wordplay is phenomenal.

how many here are actually paying attention?

>>7996250

its applicable if you're listening to the right music.

what is a prospective and how could that possibly pertain to anything happening here?

>>7996234

…. i'm not saying it doesn't exist, but i am saying your intution might suck.

>>7996125

ITS RIGHT THERE. THE WHOLE TIME

>An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)

VESSEL

VESSEL

VESSEL

VESSEL

2653

The History of Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Appointed by Bill Clinton

Q

!!mG7VJxZNCI

6 Jan 2019 - 9:32:35 AM

[RBG]

Why was she 'selected'?

Who appointed her?

Remember [her] history.

Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Highlights:

>Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)

>Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)

>Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)

>Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)

>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)

>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)

>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)

>Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)

>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)

>An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)

>Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)

>Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.

http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/📁

Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?

What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?

What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?

What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?

Who is managing her care?

Who is 'really' managing her care?

The clock is ticking.

PANIC IN DC.

Q

>>7996384

https://www2.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf

[3]

The Supreme Court historically has examined problems of equal protection by conceptualizing and labelling the category of interest at issue (race, economic status, nationality, sex) and then applying a standard of review to study and judge the legislation which is claimed to affect that category of people. State economic legislation that affects a category of people, for instance, need pass only a minimal standard:the legislation must be "rationally related" to a State policy.

When the categories at issue are those of race,

>alienage, or

>national origin,

then any legislation that isolates such a category is suspect (hence these categories are labelled "suspect classifications") and that legislation will be subject to

>"strict scrutiny," the highest judicial standard established.

Many constitutional reformers contend that "sex" should be defined as a "suspect" classification. If this were to happen, then any legislation that treated women differently than men would have to meet the strict scrutiny test.

>The Supreme Court has so far been unwilling to establish sex as a suspect classification.

>As a result, sex discriminatory legislation need not withstand the strict scrutiny test when the effects of such legislation are evaluated by the Court.

Three recent cases involving legal rights based on the category of sex demonstrate the piecemeal manner with which the Supreme Court applies the equal protection clause and illustrate the need for more comprehensive protection.

case [3]

In a third decision, Schlesinger v. Ballard,5 the Court upheld a Navy regulation that provided for mandatory discharge of male Navy officers who had served 9 years without promotion but discharged female officers after 13 years.

^^^

read that

men = 9 years

women = 13 years

Is this still happening ?

>>7996057

spin some more

postmaster general

post | mast

….. cross?