Anonymous ID: c9fa48 Feb. 2, 2020, 1:35 p.m. No.8003745   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3878 >>3898 >>3957 >>4206 >>4357

>>8003589 lb

>Scientists classify life in a few different ways,

 

Beware the TRAP!

Of thinking that science is consensus.

That is politics, not science.

 

Real science is ARGUMENT

Discussion and disagreement

Go to where real scientists gather

And pay attention

You can even see shadows of this

In the letters column of magazines like

New Scientist

Science

Scientific American

Anonymous ID: c9fa48 Feb. 2, 2020, 1:41 p.m. No.8003823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3850 >>3876

>>8003589

 

No humans are most emphatically

NOT a type of animal

 

Humans are a type of angelic being

That happens to be possessing an animal body

Living in a symbiotic relationship

A healthy human allows its ape

To be an animal

To fuck, to be in natural places

To eat delicious food

To splash in the water

And so, the ape, being happy

Spends most of its time dreaming

Allowing the human to use the body

For angelic things like talking

Working, planning, building

 

Humans are essentially

Lucifer

Fallen down to earth

Like a lightning bolt of soul energy

Onto the mountain of a special ape skull

Thereby gaining entry to the brain

And taking possession of the body

For a time.

But only for a time

 

Because humans are immortal souls

Emanations from God who is the source of all

We are sparks of God

Not animals

Not physical

And not mortal either

 

Like the Michelangelo painting shows

Every one of us can communicate directly with God

Anonymous ID: c9fa48 Feb. 2, 2020, 1:46 p.m. No.8003878   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4206 >>4357

>>8003745

 

Why do scientists disagree? Explaining and improving measures of the perceived causes of scientific disputes

 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211269

 

There has been increasing attention to understanding how laypeople explain disagreements among scientists

 

… Second, we have preliminary evidence that these attributions are more strongly driven by attitudes and worldviews as opposed to objective knowledge and skills. … How can we improve science communication in light of these findings? We are excited by the prospects, and encourage other scholars to join in broadening our understanding of this aspect of science and society.

Anonymous ID: c9fa48 Feb. 2, 2020, 1:56 p.m. No.8003957   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4206 >>4357

>>8003745

 

The Scientific Method and Pseudo-PseudoScience

 

https://theethicalskeptic.com/2010/11/03/the-scientific-method-pseudo-pseudoscience/

 

The unbridled seeking of ‘proof’ as the first step of the scientific method, complimented by declaration of a subject to be a pseudoscience, in absence of having applied the scientific method in order to derive that conclusion, constitutes in itself, pseudoscience.

 

‘Wrong’ without science, is an opinion. Science is a method.

 

Pseudoscience is an errant methodology on the other hand where one assumes that there is not a need for process and that the prevailing theory is “Proven until another theory is proven” Pseudoscience (Graphic 3) is any process which skips major steps in the scientific method in an attempt to shore up a “proven” or popular or pat answer construct – without having to actually do the work and adhere to the discipline.

Anonymous ID: c9fa48 Feb. 2, 2020, 2:15 p.m. No.8004139   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4282

>>8003850

 

I beg to differ.

The pig part is correct

But the human body is still primarily an ape, not a sheep

And the DNA is mostly identical to the Chimpanzee

 

We have been lied to about The Origin of the Species

They told us that species cannot mate with each other

Hybrids cannot form

But experience shows this to be wrong

The scientific explanation should have been

That the Probablility of hybrids between species

Is very low.

But LOW does not equal ZERO

There is evidence in the human organism that we have pig in our ancestry

The working theory of the geneticist who came to this conclusion

Is that an African boar mated with a female chimpanzee

Who got pregnant, gave birth and raised a fertile hybrid

Who then mated with a chimpanzee and had offspring

And those offspring mated with chimpanzees

Until something caused the oddball hairless chimps

To move apart

Maybe they liked to hang out in the water catching fish and digging up clams

While the others sought the high ground where trees protected them from predators.

 

Read all about it here:

 

http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html

 

Moreover, human sperm is not merely abnormal in appearance — a high percentage of human spermatozoa are actually dysfunctional. These and other facts demonstrate that human fertility is low in comparison with that of other mammals (for detailed documentation of this fact see the article Evidence of Human Infertility). Infertility and sperm abnormalities are characteristic of hybrids. So this finding suggests that it's reasonable to suppose, at least for the sake of argument, that human origins can be traced to a hybrid cross. It is also consistent with the idea that the hybridization in question was between two rather distinct and genetically incompatible types of animals, that is, it was a distant cross.

 

Don't miss the Next page >> links because the story is told over 4 pages with lots of details of anatomy and skeletal anomalies. And if you look around the other parts of the site, this fellow has a deep knowledge of hybridization in animals, and has plenty of evidence of other interspecies hybrids like cat-rabbits.

 

It now seems obvious that evolution was driven as much by hybridization as by mutation. In both cases they are rare events, but if they do not kill the offspring, then they enrich the gene pool.

 

And when you look at the fossil record of pre-cambrian organisms and see all those things that look like different parts of an animal's anatomy swimming around the sea, you realize that we are likely the end result of hundreds of hybridization events where DNA from two different evolutionary chains combined in one organism.

Anonymous ID: c9fa48 Feb. 2, 2020, 2:26 p.m. No.8004248   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4260

>>8004123

 

The Pontifical Swiss Guard has its origins in the 15th century. Pope Sixtus IV (1471–1484) had already made an alliance with the Swiss Confederacy and built barracks in Via Pellegrino after foreseeing the possibility of recruiting Swiss mercenaries.

 

On the occasion of the 500th anniversary of the Swiss Guard, in April–May 2006, 80 former guardsmen marched from Bellinzona in southern Switzerland to Rome, recalling the march of the original 200 Swiss guards to take up Papal service, in 1505. The march had been preceded by other celebrations in Lucerne, including a rally of veterans of the Guard and a Mass.[16] In a public ceremony on 6 May 2006, 33 new guards were sworn in on the steps of St. Peter's Basilica instead of the traditional venue in the San Damaso Courtyard. The date chosen marked the anniversary of the Sack of Rome when the Swiss Guard had been nearly destroyed. Present at this event were representatives of the Company of Pikemen and Musketeers of the Honourable Artillery Company of London and the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Massachusetts.

Anonymous ID: c9fa48 Feb. 2, 2020, 2:27 p.m. No.8004260   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8004248

Chartered in 1638-The First Military Company Chartered in the Western Hemisphere

 

As the settlements, which followed the landing at Plymouth increased and spread, there was no organized military force for protection. There were only local volunteer companies and there was no join action or centralized authority. Many of the settlers of Boston had been members in England, of the Honourable Artillery Company of London (organized and chartered in 1537) and it was natural that the military training they had received in that Company should lead them to form a similar organization in the new country. In 1637 the Company was formed for instruction in discipline and tactics. Governor Winthrop granted a Charter in March 1638, and on the first Monday in June following, an election of Officers was held on Boston Common. Since that time, the Company has maintained the tradition of holding their annual elections on the Boston Common on the first Monday in June by casting their votes on the Drum Head.

 

Since 1746, the Headquarters of the Ancient's had been located in Faneuil Hall - an historic citadel known to all Americans.

 

In its Armory, the Company maintains a Military Museum and Library, which is without equal in the United States. Here are relics of every war in which this Country has been engaged, since its settlement. The Armory is open to the public daily, and many thousands of visitors from every part of the world register every year in the Guest Book.

 

The members of the Company trod the fields of every battlefield of New England; they fought for freedom on foreign soil; they judged the courts; they pleaded at the bar; they instituted town government and leveled forests; and they were active in settling the towns of the frontier.

 

Ancient and Honourable Artillery Company members served on every battlefield from Bunker Hill to Yorktown, the War of 1812 and the Civil War, both World Wars, Korea, Vietnam and Desert Storm.

 

This is the Company that Washington knew, that Franklin saw march through the streets of Boston, that John Adams and John Quincy Adams visited; that has had eight members who received our nation's highest military decoration - the Medal of Honor - and has had four of its members serve in the worlds' most important office, President of the United States; President James Monroe, Chester Alan Arthur, Calvin Coolidge and John F. Kennedy; the same Company which has always stood for, and always will stand for, the best in citizenship.

Anonymous ID: c9fa48 Feb. 2, 2020, 2:39 p.m. No.8004375   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4403

>>8004244

 

First of all, there is no such thing as HIV drugs.

The things that you call drugs are in reality biochemicals.

A biochemical is part of a biochemical pathway

I have included a simplified version of some common pathways

 

YES!, I really did mean SIMPLIFIED!

The mammalian organism is a very, very complex biochemical machine.

Now, the things called HIV drugs have certain effects in the body.

Since HIV is a virus, you can be sure that they somehow affect those viruses.

However, they could do a lot of things.

One thing that the biochemicals called drugs often do

Is they bind to things on the surface of a microorganism (virus or bacteria)

And disrupt its functioning.

They might destroy the shell

They might enter the shell and fuck with the biochemistry internally

They might just slow it down.

 

In any case, the fact that they can bind is determined by the structure of the shell surface

And that is determined by the genetic material of the microorganism

And since viruses and bacteria are indeed organisms

They have relatives

Close and far

And related species of virus can have similarities in their structure

 

And now we get to the crux of the matter

If two related species of virus (who could be distantly related) happen to both have a particular spike protein on their shell

Then the same drug (biochemical) can be used to affect both of them.

 

Names like HIV and Coronavirus are totally irrelevant.

We are talking about machines

They all work in similar ways

Biochemicals go in

They get processed,

The organism reproduces or dies

Biochemicals come out.

 

It really is that simple

See, complexity can be more simple than you thought!

Read the papers on 2019-nCoV

It's all explained there in a couple dozen papers

All open source

Simples!!!