two of the meme fags seems to be battling each other and they are taking their fight across breads.

Now, anon, we see this as an obvious slide, but at the same time . . . the memes are not all so great, and the meme type is often that robo spam single font just a picture and a giant label, without very much creativity . . . and the other one who does an interesting meme style but uses POTUS as a shiva which is . . . questionable because it is, to me, up to POTUS how his memes should be here . . . I only like ones that shun from the idolatry of equating POTUS to a perhistorical religoius meme-figure (shiva or is it shackti (SP).

anyway last bread one of these was 40 and the other was 17.

I think it's an inorganic mock battle.

>>8011523

I think that the memes you post are often exceptional. I think that you are the one who was battling the 40 post poster with the untalented memes last bread.

My question for you: are these memes with a POTUS like shakti destroyer or shiva creator something that POTUS likes?

Just curious.

>>8011595

Many westerners are iconoclasts.

that means they don't like idolatry.

I guess that some imagine that videos of POTUS depicted as Shakti or Shiva, or any diety, aree idoltry. that is perhaps you garner such a strong reaction.

>>8011649

Here is the other part: the images you select are often exceptional. the melding of the text into the graphics is always well performed. Please understand this isn't to compliment you, becaue I am not trying to grow you ego. But the other meme provider, who attacks you, gives a copy-pasta quality app-produced meme that just seems to be (1) a single font in giant bold

(2) a random trite message, often with ethnic bullshit in it (3) a picture that is just a copy pasta and nothing clever or meme like without the text.

and then there is a team of them attacking you.

wierd.

>>8011769

I tried to draw out if he thought using POTUS to look like SHIVA/SHAKTI was OK.

he dodged that.

I think some of his visuals are very good.

the visuals of the other one don't show a lot of talent.

there is a point with someone like that anon (you say Shiva shill) is that badgering them doesn't really help the situation here.

but if that's what you do, carry on (you are tasked to draw out information?)

It's all good it's just interesting and I like to analyze these things. I think using POTUS, for me, is what the problem most have with that Shiva/Shakti anon. It's seen to be, perhaps, idolatrous.

>>8011834

the quote about 'cahos in mines' is not from me, anon.

>>8011909

my point is 'do what you do and I'm not telling you how or what to do'

; )

some people here are tasked.

I don't like the use of POTUS in memes like that but I'm not POTUS and so I don't really know what his team thinks of those memes.

TECCHH-nick-lee by putting 'im still not namefagging' in the name field . . .

but for me . . . I just want the name fags to be safe.

People are awesome, even some of the name fags and my point is to protect them they need to remain anonymous here.

but some of them are really awesome.

wtih the Shakti/Shiva Shill, I think you keeping an eye open is a good thing.

>>8011916

well they are caling you the Shiva Shill

I called you the Shiva/Shakti anon but then . . . I confess (it was too easy to say it ) I called you the

Shakti/Shiva Shill (it rolls off the tongue).

I think that many do find your use of POTUS like demon/gawd figure with multiple arms to be what is known as 'not cool' or 'shillish'

someone even equates great power to your memes saying that they,

" . . . " well you can look for that quote, it's in the bread here.

I think you just should realize that you and the other anon are battling and you need to have a truce.

cut back on the POTUS as a demon memes and I'm sure the attackes will slack off.

>>8011744

You think they are AI, they think you are AI.

I think you both are real.

>>8012050

your on the field of Battle, Arjuna. Maybe you aren't at the point of having the revelation . . . about who all the people you fight are . . . to you . . .in the by-and-by?