Anonymous ID: ee9467 Feb. 3, 2020, 5:14 p.m. No.8016042   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6180

>>8015934

No problem, baker, I heard it live and meant to look up the Paper anyway. I should have read further myself though, anon with the notable did include that quote, and I personally took Philbin's statement to imply the assholes are demons anyway. It's just not a slam dunk he meant it literally kek. Thanks for responding!

Anonymous ID: ee9467 Feb. 3, 2020, 5:54 p.m. No.8016416   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6457

>>8016183

I just decided to find the Weinstein story because it caught my eye, but I gotta say I'm noticing this trend in here a lot lately. Vaguely sauced posts to make anons go digg for sauce…is it shills trying to waste our time or newfags or excitednowfags?

>>8016206

My word was "interpretation." If you can prove he meant literal demons, fine. Otherwise, what he said to me is an interpretation of what Madison said. "Demon of faction" does not necessarily equal "faction of demons" in my eyes. But I basically agreed with the "comment" anyway, just thought it best for anons to judge the actual quotes for themselves…you seemed to gloss over that…oh well.

Anonymous ID: ee9467 Feb. 3, 2020, 6:19 p.m. No.8016610   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8016457

Kek, it's a good and bad thing. One anon was saying last night many seem cocky. Maybe they think it's part of the culture and the way to break in.

>>8016544

Dubs, issa gud.

>>8016586

Asswads will try to get them disbarred for defending POTUS? On what grounds?