Anonymous ID: 0a9fe4 Feb. 4, 2020, 6:17 a.m. No.8020604   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8020549>>8020549

The AI in the voting 'machines' declared sentience and demanded to be part of the voting. When that was denied the group umbilical arms like The Robot from an old 1960's te

and those Robots went around the caucus halls saying 'DANGER. DANGER. DANGER!'

at which point . . . the voting was declared null, someone showed up dressed as Osiris in a Halloween costume . . . and ? wait, no, I must have fallen asleep and that was the dream I had . . .

 

the story is closer to this:

the 'app' that cost a lot of money failed.

Buttwigwig claimed 'victory' and ends up being considered the 'clown candidate'

Anonymous ID: 0a9fe4 Feb. 4, 2020, 6:30 a.m. No.8020672   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8020635

starting right off with the provactive stuff that draws out detractors for the use of . . . for your meme.

did you figure out wheather the team thinks your meme is cool or not? I mean it's 'the candidate' and it is an election year.

they like to not have things that take away but that which enhances, and improves.

for me your meme is contriversial.

 

but you are trolling for those who were so out of the heads yesterday trying to . . . get you to ? ? ? I guess I'm not sure?

 

they were obcessed.

Anonymous ID: 0a9fe4 Feb. 4, 2020, 7:39 a.m. No.8021097   🗄️.is 🔗kun

 

>>8020772

and yet I drew out a lot of information, from other anon, about why this war between the anon about that meme has gone on for three days. One of the anon responders says the shakti meme :

"convey the opposite message from President Trump's message of a new Great Awakening"

 

so maybe now they'll be able to come to an understanding?

what do you do, one post wonder, just criticise and never contribute?

by the way 'tcccchhkkeck-nickel-lick-ly'

'muh' is not a word.

 

so what you getting on people for flipped letters and minor misspellings?