Anonymous ID: 27c475 Sept. 3, 2020, 2:47 p.m. No.10518685   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0345

>>10438403

>>10472371

>>10507032

 

This is an interesting opinion piece written in 1974 which discusses the meetings of various people from South Africa and the US, http://kora.matrix.msu.edu/files/50/304/32-130-F09-84-al.sff.document.af000159.pdf. The noteworthy statements are;

 

“The State Department appears to have gone out of its way to bring or to assist in bringing to the United States large numbers of moderate African and Coloured leaders who can play a role in South Africa “progress toward majority rule.”

 

The names of Chief Gatsha Buthelezi, John Thorne, David Thebehali, Chief Clemens Kapuo, and Bishop Auala come to mind. Visits by moderate white opposition leaders such as the United Party’s Harry Schwartz have been judiciously offset by visits such as that of Nationalist Party Minister of Mines, Immigration, Sport and Recreation, Piet Kornhoof, schedule for early 1975.

 

The most significant visits, however, have been those of top-ranking political and military figures of the Nationalist government. In the 1960s, U.S. policy was to limit military contacts to inconspicuous correspondence courses or industrial courses at the War College. In a break with past practice, Kissinger in 1974 overruled Africa Bureau recommendations and permitted “private visits” by South African VIPs on military business. In January 1974, South African Minister of Information Dr. Cornelius Mulder, widely regarded as the likely successor to Prime Minister Vorster when the latter retires, met with Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Vice Admiral Ray Peet, the senior officer responsible for International Security Affairs and the Indian Ocean, as well as with the then Vice-President, Gerald Ford. In May, the Chief of the South African Defence Forces, Admiral Hugo Biermann, a skilled propagandist for the strategic value of the Cape route, met with Admiral Thomas Moorer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and with J. W. Middendorf, Acting Secretary of the Navy.”

 

“Press reports credit Donald Easum, Assistant Secretary for African Affairs, with helping to pave the way for recent top-level discussion in Lusaka between leaders of southern Africa’s white and black states. Rumors persist that Kenneth Kaunda, Julius Nyerere, and John Vorster have agreed to a détente scheme through which Rhodesia would peacefully move to majority rule in five years, Namibia would receive a carefully safeguarded opportunity for self-determination under at least formal UN auspices, and South Africa would show a willingness to “moderate” its own apartheid system.”

 

Keep in mind, Prime Minister H. F. Verwoerd of South Africa was murdered in 1966 and John Vorster replaced him. Also Kenneth Kaunda, became the Secretary General of the ANC in Lusaka in the early 1950s.

Anonymous ID: 27c475 Sept. 10, 2020, 11:15 a.m. No.10590625   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0326

>>10505818

 

“Did Eskom money fund the ANC? | State Capture Inquiry” - https://youtu.be/6fgEN_M5a_s

 

Tsotsi is a fitting surname for Zola which means "a Black street thug or gang member".

Anonymous ID: 27c475 Sept. 19, 2020, 7:15 a.m. No.10708035   🗄️.is 🔗kun

“A DARPA-Funded Implantable Biochip To Detect COVID-19 Could Hit Markets By 2021” - https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/darpa-funded-implantable-biochip-detect-covid-19-could-hit-markets-2021.

 

“Once firmly implanted inside the body, human cells are at the mercy of any mRNA program delivered via this substrate, unleashing a nightmare of possibilities. It is, perhaps, the first true step towards full-on transhumanism; a “philosophy” that is in vogue with many powerful and influential people, such as Google’s Ray Kurzweil and Eric Schmidt and whose proponents see the fusion of technology and biology as an inevitable consequence of human progress.

 

The private company created to market this technology, that allows for biological processes to be controlled remotely and opens the door to the potential manipulation of our biological responses and, ultimately, our entire existence, is called Profusa Inc and its operations are funded with millions from NIH and DARPA. In March, the company was quietly inserted into the crowded COVID-19 bazaar in March 2020, when it announced an injectable biochip for the detection of viral respiratory diseases, including COVID-19.

 

In July, a preliminary report funded by Fauci’s NIAID and the NIH on an mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was published in The New England Journal of Medicine, concluding that mRNA-1273 vaccine. provided by Moderna for the study, “induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified,” and supported “further development of this vaccine.

 

A month earlier, the NIH had claimed a joint stake in Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, citing a contract signed in December, 2019, stipulating that the “mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates [are] developed and jointly owned” by both parties. Moderna disputes the federal government’s position, stating that the company “has a broad owned and licensed IP estate” and is “not aware of any IP that would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates, including mRNA-1273.””