“Rothschild Communist controlled South Africa” at https://youtu.be/sopIFblMgWc

Mandela’s handwritten manuscript – “How to be a Good Communist” can be found at http://rhodesia.nl/goodcom.html. Below are a few excerpts.

“Communists everywhere fight to destroy capitalist society and to replace it with Socialism, where the masses of the common people, irrespective of race or colour, will live in complete equality, freedom and happiness. They seek to revolutionise society and are thus called revolutionaries. Those who support capitalism with its class divisions and other evils and who oppose our just struggles to end oppression are called counter revolutionaries.

Comrade Liu Hao Schi, member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, says:

we Communist Party members are the most advanced revolutionaries in modern history and are the contemporary fighting and driving force in changing society and the world. Revolutionaries exist because counter-revolutionaries still exist. Therefore, to conduct a ceaseless struggle against the counter-revolutionaries constitutes an essential condition for the existence and development of revolutionaries. If they fail to carry on such a struggle, they cannot be called revolutionaries and still less can they advance and develop. It is in the course of this … [that] … members change society, change the world and at the same time change themselves.

To succeed in conducting a ceaseless struggle against the counter-revolutionaries, and to be able to play the vital role of being the most advanced revolutionary and driving force in changing society and the world, one must put all else aside and seriously and faithfully undertake self-cultivation.”

“On Page One of this section we found out that our aim is to change the present world into a Communist world where there will be no exploiters and exploited, no oppressor and oppressed, no rich and poor. We also make the point that the victory of Socialism in the U.S.S.R., in China and other States in Asia and Eastern Europe proves that a Communist world is capable of attainment. Moreover, since the victory of Socialism in the U.S.S.R. in 1917, the Socialist camp has grown to become a world force with a population of more than 1,000 million and occupying a third of the globe.

But in spite of this victorious advance, the Communist movement still faces powerful enemies which must be crushed and wiped out from the face of the earth before a Communist world can be realised. Without a hard and bitter and long struggle against capitalism and exploitation, there can be no Communist world.”

“We test a Communist Party member’s loyalty to the Party, to the revolution and the Communist cause by the manner in which he absolutely and unconditionally subordinates his interests to those of the Party under all circumstances. To sacrifice one’s personal interests and even one’s life without hesitation for the cause of the Party is the highest manifestation of Communist ethics.”

>>10128735

Their rhetoric continues today, “WATCH: Counter-revolutions will never stop - Ace Magashule on the ANC” at https://youtu.be/n0sWWuXR80E

>>10128735

>>10009260

https://youtu.be/vgquLxwHJF0 - The minorities are fed-up in South Africa as demonstrated in the video.

This article, “Affirmative Action in South Africa Must Be Ended Immediately” at https://rationalstandard.com/affirmative-action-sa-ended-immediately/, states in the below excerpts;

“An article published in the London Times some years ago noted that “South Africa is the only country in the world where affirmative action is in the favour of the majority who has complete political control,” a sentiment that all too accurately captures the country’s preposterous state of play, yet the policy continues.”

“So even if a far more extensive form of affirmative action was instituted, entailing denying all white people any form of employment, while simultaneously confiscating all their property and other assets, would only make a minimal dent in South Africa’s immense poverty rate and vast inequality. How then, one might ask, does the ANC expect to eradicate wide-ranging poverty affecting tens of millions through this policy?

That the ANC sees the need to continue instituting affirmative action, despite the blatant failure to achieve the policy’s ostensible aims, is addressed in the same Times article quoted above as it goes on to aver that the “fact that the political majority requires affirmative action to protect them against a 9% minority group is testament to a complete failure on their part to build their own wealth making structures, such that their only solution is to take it from others.”This summary of the ANC’s rank incompetence and real kleptocratic agenda could hardly be bettered.”

“Instead of racist social engineering and sowing hateful divisiveness, the ANC should instead pursue positive sum economic growth and a truly bold vision that all South Africans could get behind. Of course, the ANC will never even consider changing its current course, dedicated as this glorified criminal enterprise is to power and self-aggrandisement at the expense of the nation, with racist social engineering policies being the preferred method to achieve this end, and which keep South Africans fighting each other rather than focusing on how this country is being destroyed by the thugs in charge.”

“Elite Capture Report: Elite capture in land redistribution in South Africa” at http://repository.uwc.ac.za/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10566/5089/PLAAS-RR-55-Elite-Capture-Web.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

“Elite capture of public resources in land reform is also on the rise.”

“This research shows that the net effect has been to redirect state resources originally intended for the poor, to the better-off.”

“Only 18% of the farms were allocated for farmworkers. In contrast, 82% of the farms were allocated to other types of beneficiaries especially those with economic and political influence.”

“Significant resources have been used to purchase land where the state has not issued any leases, as required by policy. These farms have thus not actually been legally redistributed, in the sense that property rights to them have not been transferred, since the intended beneficiaries have no secure land rights or leases to confirm their occupation of the land.”

“Well-off beneficiaries (urban-based business individuals, taxi or transport operators, former state bureaucrats and local politicians) with access to material resources, knowledge and information, often qualify as beneficiaries. State bureaucrats and the politically powerful often capture resources in land reform through the following practices: the soliciting and payment of bribes, ‘double-dipping’, fronting, the imposition of politically-connected beneficiaries and bailing out of politically-connected people. State bureaucrats have, in some cases, withheld leases and threatened non-compliant beneficiaries with eviction. Agribusinesses also engage in ‘farm flipping’, the imposition of strategic partners and mentors, capturing of value in the agro-value chains, prioritising high-value crops at the expense of multiple livelihoods, and failing to declare dividends.”

“Elite capture is also attributable to corrupt practices by state officials, economically and politically powerful people and established agribusiness.”

>>10332028

Keep in mind.

In the article dated 24 April 2018, https://www.afriforum.co.za/en/afriforum-reveals-new-information-land-ownership-well-memorandum-international-community-expropriation-without-compensation/, it states;

“Regarding the demand for agricultural land, AfriForum today revealed that 57,8% of land claims up to now had been for urban land – and not agricultural land. It is also common knowledge that 93% of people who submitted land claims indicated that they preferred financial compensation rather than land restitution. The Institute of Race Relations also found that only 1% of people in South Africa believe that land reform would improve their lives.

In terms of the third problem, Government conceded that more than 90% of farms that the State had transferred to black owners had failed. Although the South African government has already spent more than R45 billion on land reform, only 6,3% of land procured by the State has been converted to private ownership.”

As https://www.brandsouthafrica.com/investments-immigration/business/economy/sectors/south-african-agriculture states, "While 12% of South Africa’s land can be used for crop production, only 22% of this is high-potential arable land. The greatest limitation is the availability of water, with uneven and unreliable rainfall."