>>8037416

>all everyone ever says is 'let the dead be dead'

>it doesn't bring Kurt back to speculate

um ok

by that logic why prosecute any crime at all

wtf is wrong with you?

never cared much fur kurt, but care much, much, MUCH less for that horrible beast

>>8037469

> Let Kurt be Kurt.

well see, that's sort of the objection people have with what CL & co. did… they didn't quite let him kurt along

>People even get upset if you post a silly meme with Kurt in it.

whut? …so?

>>8037506

>Revival.

there's a new sig… intrasting

>>8037593

i guess not technically… what makes last lines of Q posts "official" signatures again?

>>8037643

well, yes, but in the context of Q drops, they've had shifting meaning(s). & patterns.

didn't always use them as a last line, didn't always use only one…

>>8037696

yes, he gave examples, but far as i know we never had a complete definite list of what were and weren't "Q Signatures".

in fact most anons just forget about em and went on with it

>>8037703

well thanks for nothing, you useless condescending cunt

>>8037769

wait, you still think Q signatures are only like regular "signatures"?

>>8037821

i guess i stand by my previous statement

>>8037756

> thanks for nothing, you useless condescending cunt

>>8037905

>and manipulate it for your purpose

do you even early Q brah

or is this manipulation >>8037696

>>8037962

so, do you always deflect by assuming it's the others who are ignorant?

how in the fuck would i not know what a signature is

>>8037989

>I personally was never satisfied that I had a good understanding of how Q was using the signatures, and I went on to other tasks here where I felt I could be more useful/productive

same here, pretty much, except for the productive part.

those days are far behind