Anonymous ID: aa43f3 Feb. 5, 2020, 6:17 p.m. No.8043682   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3709 >>3771 >>3815 >>3877 >>3886 >>4044 >>4120

>>8043356 lb

>Do you know how much cabal capital is set in power lines and right of ways?

Actually I do. During the period right after the teleco breakup consent decree, where AT&T and the Bell System were broken up into the regional carriers we have today, it was made very clear to us that railroad rights-of-way were very valuable and the telephone companies were agressively pursuing easments and acquisitions to get access to these long-haul rights-of-way to lay the new fiber optic lines that were just beginning to be deployed at that time.

However your connection with Edison and Tesla appears to be a non-sequitur, unless one adds some assumptions. Edison's alternating current power scheme required a lot of long copper wires, which would have utilized the railroads' rights of way. Tesla's power scheme was DC (direct current), also over copper wires, also requiring rights of way. (Actually long-haul DC power would require even more copper, much fatter conductors, to minimize resistive losses in the transmission lines. If they stepped up the voltage enough to reduce resistive losses, the high voltage DC would instantly kill.) The Tesla patents, however, talk about wireless power transmission and radiant power collection (the ones I've read). Whether/how that would be done remains unclear. People wave their hands a lot and say "Tesla" but very few of them have read his patents or tried to replicate any of his inventions.

 

I hope this makes sense, I am very tired.

If Tesla had perfected and demonstrated wireless power transmission on an industrial scale and with adequate safety, then your comparison of Edison and Tesla vis-a-vis the early railroads would have some legs. There would have been a motivation to select Edison's AC power approach over Tesla's electricity, because the railroad rights of way would have given the owner control over the power grid, the transmission lines, and a vehicle to lock in enormous profits.

Is that what you're getting at?

 

>>8043249 lb

Praying Muh Dick?

Plus he has no way of knowing the cause of changes in web traffic over here.