AND, quotation marks around the words. Who else may have said this very recently?
No question mark though. Perhaps incomplete?
AND, he has quotes around "What Really Happened". Who else has said this recently that he might be quoting?
Think about this, Anons. It would be ridiculous to leave instructions to tear up the speech. There are rules/laws against doing this, for one (see notables in pb). For 2, and one of the Congress members (senator or congressmanโฆcan't remember which as I've been listening to news all day with them) said they were going to possibly report her to Ethics Committee for Ethics violation. So, if instructions were included in her document to do so, then bringing her up on charges would be moot.
SpouseAnon also is JAG, though retired. And served in the 80s. We did run into quite a few Mormons but no JAG mormons (served in EU). Mormons in many other professions, especially dentistry. But that was then, and this is now.
'Partisan troll': Legal scholar Jonathan Turley calls on Pelosi to resign
Legal scholar Jonathan Turley called for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to resign after she tore up her copy of President Trump's State of the Union address following Trump's speech.
Turley, a law professor at George Washington University and the sole witness for Republicans in Trump's impeachment trial, took issue with Pelosi's failure to remain "in stone-faced neutrality" during Trump's speech and to gavel out protests by Democratic members. "She seemed to join it," Turley said in a blog post published Wednesday, calling her "little more than a partisan troll."
"If Pelosi cannot maintain the dignity and neutrality of her office at the State of the Union, she should resign," he argued in an op-ed published Wednesday by The Hill.
Turley slammed the Democrats on Twitter for their lack of composure, which he called "incredibly inappropriate" given the president's attendance as a "guest of both houses."
Trump made no mention of impeachment in his 75-minute-long speech. But his avoidance of Pelosi's handshake, which he may not have seen, before he began his remarks and Pelosi both leaving out the traditional "high privilege and honor" to introduce the president and also tearing up his speech all brought to the fore the hostilities evident between Trump and many House lawmakers.
Turley testified before the House Judiciary Committee last year that while Democrats could make a case for impeachment, they had not done so. In his remarks, Turley chided Democrats for freely declaring impeachable offenses by the president that spanned "everything from treason to conspiracy to obstruction," before "suddenly, just a few weeks ago, the House announced it would begin an impeachment inquiry and push for a final vote in just a matter of weeks." Turley appeared alongside three other witnesses, all chosen by the Democrats.
The Senate will conclude its impeachment trial on Wednesday with a likely acquittal.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/partisan-troll-legal-scholar-turley-calls-on-pelosi-to-resign
You must be new. We research things here. Research for yourself, NewAnon, and bring what you find, if substantial, to the board.
NOTABLE
Notable
That would explain why there was no question mark in his tweet.
Notable
Have seen this several times on the board now. Probably in notables somewhere in the last 24 hours.
Proof? I didn't think so.
Yeah, I was here the night she said Farce. It's a word she uses frequently.
Not proof to me. But you're welcome to your own opinion, of course.