>>8048250

We have an equatorial solenoid that factors in, as well. Arcing can occur without the secondary planet interaction, but there are definitely accounts of close approaches with other celestial bodies that triggered events. The aftermath of modern earthquakes reveal the same fractal patterns we associate with these electrical features. However, it's the scale differential that make me question whether the larger features that have shaped the planet could be done by our sun. Also, worth remembering, that the planets themselves affect the sun and how it behaves. Alignments are known to increase activity.

I also see sheer force behind shifting of continents, that I could only think to explain with additional bodies present to provide alternate points where a strong electromagnetic force could position itself to exert the force needed to redistribute our landmass in the manner we observe today. On top of a few other features, that correlate really nicely with things like say the planet Mars reigning down fireballs onto our Northern hemisphere, along with dichotomous features of the planet Mars itself, which again, all seem to support this idea of a polar configuration, which is already supported by symbols and legends.

I know you like the micronova theory, I'm just saying I'm not sold as it being a valid explanation to explain the many "mysteries" we observe in our celestial neighborhood.

>>8048653

>There's black glass on the moon.

On the side facing our planet.

I propose that was from when the moon crashed into our atmosphere. Much higher probability than if it was from burst from the sun. Earth and our moon act as a single point charge in relation to the sun, now. The probability of the moon being exactly behind our planet so that the scarring would occur on that side, even if from a secondary discharge between our planet and the moon, is much slimmer compared to a collision-style theory.

But again, it's not just tour planet. The scarring on Mars is North/South dichotomous, to where nothing seems to make sense from a micronova perspective to cause those featured "anomalies". Makes perfect sense for the polar configuration though.

>>8048714

>I think for many of the uninitiated folk just hearing of a EU hypothesis for the first time, the jump to planets in chaos is a bridge too far (considering we've all been indoctrinated into a uniformitarian geologic worldview) and they'll reject the concept off-hand.

I find it was the symbols themselves along with the actual accounts of these encounters that make these ideas so exciting. We are literally drugging children so they can "pay attention" to boring uniformitarian faulty ideology that we've been programming into people's minds for far too long. I'm really not in the mood to cater to those who brainwash kids while ridiculing others. In the world of Ice-T, they can "eat a dick".

But honestly, tho. The micronova is the text book definition of fear porn. Make people panic without any evidence what-so-ever, besides a false translation of data due to a blatantly flawed ideology. The beauty of the planetary encounters is that they were part of a solar system restructuring process that does need to happen again any time in the near future, and people can actually try to enjoy life for a change instead of living in constant fear about the "end of the world", that already happened millennia ago. Remember, they control us by fear.