WE CAN'T LET THAT GO ON
>Ranging round on target. Fire for effect, POTUS
It's not moot, under the doctrine of jurisprudence that allows for review of events that have resolved before judgment can be rendered if it is "capable of repetition yet evading review."
House is already moving to conduct its next ethics investigation. The question presented for review of the previous impeachment is whether a sitting President can be impeached for allegations not specifically delineated under existing statutory or Federal common law as a "high crime or misdemeanor."
I'll say it again, since reading comp isn't your strong suit…
It's not moot, under the doctrine of jurisprudence that allows for review of events that have RESOLVED before judgment - by the court - can be rendered if it is
>"capable of repetition yet evading review."
Look it up. It's a no kiding legal doctrine concerning the issue of mootness.