>>8058244

>>>8056704

>Basically what Q is saying is WWIII - 2 + 2 = 6

>The US was under attack. The corruption of our political system was the first wave.

>QUESTION: Are the fires in Australia related? All the land China bought? Droughted, then set ablaze? Is the corona virus a retaliation to that attack?

>>8058409

WW + II (2 + 2) = WW III (2+3 (+1 the next step)=6), Or world war 2 plus 1 is World war 3

>>8058557

We have been under attack.

>>8058569

Australia is the first to fall under the first wave. They bought up land

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/china-increases-its-stake-in-australian-land-20181220-p50ng0.html

Farmed off the water and turned the place into a drought. and set it ablaze.

>>8058569

The first wave of attack of world war 3 has been the slow incremental corruption of our politicians from both the Russia (through Ukraine) side, and the Chinese (apple, and chips secrets) side.

>>8058710

I guess so. Its been a while since I been here. I kinda left the baord a little before 8hcan went down. No one answering my questions. Basically Q's most recent psots are saying world war 3 right. Weve been under attack. The first wave was the incremental corruption of our politicians. right. From both China and Russia?

>>8058758

The silent war continues? Think bigger? I think so.

>>8058758

I was here during the whole apple days. When Q went to apple. IMHO apple was selling china tech secrets. One of the first trillion dollar companies?

>>8058794

Ok yea that makes sense. The Chinese were poor as shit before and brought into the wto. We "civilized" them under central banking methods of finance". Taught em how to print cash out of nothing.

I dont know what group fienstein is with.

And they propped China up for slave labor.