Anonymous ID: a699a3 Feb. 7, 2020, 6:49 p.m. No.8068651   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8663 >>8809 >>9127

Wind Turbine Blades Filling Landfills

 

Wind Turbine Blades Can’t Be Recycled, So They’re Piling Up in Landfills

Feb 7, 2020 (excerpts from the article)

(Bloomberg) – A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer.

 

The municipal landfill in Casper, Wyoming, is the final resting place of 870 blades whose days making renewable energy have come to end. The severed fragments look like bleached whale bones nestled against one another.

 

“That’s the end of it for this winter,” said waste technician Michael Bratvold, watching a bulldozer bury them forever in sand. “We’ll get the rest when the weather breaks this spring.”

 

        • *

 

Tens of thousands of aging blades are coming down from steel towers around the world and most have nowhere to go but landfills. In the U.S. alone, about 8,000 will be removed in each of the next four years. Europe, which has been dealing with the problem longer, has about 3,800 coming down annually through at least 2022, according to BloombergNEF. It’s going to get worse: Most were built more than a decade ago, when installations were less than a fifth of what they are now.

 

        • *

 

The first models were expensive and inefficient, spinning fast and low. After 1992, when Congress passed a tax credit, manufacturers invested in taller and more powerful designs. Their steel tubes rose 260 feet and sported swooping fiberglass blades. A decade later, General Electric Co. made its 1.5 megawatt model—enough to supply 1,200 homes in a stiff breeze—an industry standard.

 

 

Wind power is carbon-free and about 85% of turbine components, including steel, copper wire, electronics and gearing can be recycled or reused. But the fiberglass blades remain difficult to dispose of. With some as long as a football field, big rigs can only carry one at a time, making transportation costs prohibitive for long-distance hauls. Scientists are trying to find better ways to separate resins from fibers or to give small chunks new life as pellets or boards.

 

In the European Union, which strictly regulates material that can go into landfills, some blades are burned in kilns that create cement or in power plants. But their energy content is weak and uneven and the burning fiberglass emits pollutants.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/wind-turbine-blades-t-recycled-100011150.html

 

Some other impacts are specialized plants & equipment to fabricate the huge blades, the temporary roads required for construction & demolition, deforestion & soil erosion in wooded & mountainous areas (eg Appalachains), bird and bat kills, removal and recycling of the steel tower sections, giant concrete foundations.

 

Maybe Greta Thunberg has a use for the weathered, delaminating fiberglass & resin blades in her Climate Change Plan [crickets]

Anonymous ID: a699a3 Feb. 7, 2020, 7:27 p.m. No.8069108   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8068976

 

Having worked as a project manager on civil construction jobs, President Trump's restoring regulations to pre-Obama was the correct positive move. Most of the regulations are merely busy work for environmental firms to study a project and potential impacts. Most details of such studies and regulations are already incorporated into the design and specifications. Cheaper for the contractor than paying fines or remedial work afterwards.

 

In addition, the state regulations are typically more stringent and more specific for a project site. A Washington bureaucrat one-size-fits all regulation does not make a safer environment, it makes paperwok, busy work for environmental and liberal groups, and delays productivity costly for a contractor and suppliers.