>>8070114

Twitter link, to a blog, to the real article:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/feb/6/second-impeachment-could-be-on-horizon-for-trump/

Impeachment 2.0? Democrats line up possible new charges against Trump

Democrats already have lined up possible charges if they choose to pursue impeachment 2.0.

Still pending is a wide-open probe launched by Rep. Adam B. Schiff, California Democrat. Mr. Schiff has been investigating President Trump, his family and businesses, the Trump Organization, over the congressman’s suspicions of blackmail, money laundering and bribery.

Republican staffers say the inquiry was put on hold last fall pending the Ukraine impeachment proceedings led by Mr. Schiff. But there is no sign Mr. Schiff has given up trying to prove Mr. Trump is corrupt, and if the president is impeached again, the charges would likely come from this probe, informed sources said.

>>8070214

Gabbard was the only one who could have been a threat to Trump in the general election. We got nothing to worry about.

>>8070222

Benford's law

>>8070219

First comment to that tweet:

>>8070381

>the fake Hawking was killed off

Nah. He just lost his molars to tooth decay. Same thing happens to meth addicts.

>>8070503

There are a couple more guys who, as of today, have plenty of free time.

>>8070479

>you know dam well who P refers to, bc Q said it was the old bloddline family Payseur.

It's amazing how many people have problems with this.

>>8070326

>>8070408

>>8070438

>>8070460

>>8070326

>"Soros takes order from P"

I've always wonders why. The Payseurs have no power beyond what others choose to give them.

>>8070636

>But Payseurs probably are Phoenecians

Why?