>>8070750 (lb)
You'd like these fren.
Make them to provoke thought about pre-history.
When I can and think of something, I like doing it because it can get someone thinking visually.
Going to work on a Solutrean Hypothesis one soon.
>>8070750 (lb)
You'd like these fren.
Make them to provoke thought about pre-history.
When I can and think of something, I like doing it because it can get someone thinking visually.
Going to work on a Solutrean Hypothesis one soon.
P = Pope in many crumbs, but there are some that fit Payseur. There are double meanings to most things with Q.
You ever see the models of what those "mound builders" cities and settlements looked like?
They're so cool.
That third graphic I posted has them in it. Don't know too much about them honestly but I want to know more.
No one ever talks about "Pre-History", which is why I'm interested in it.
There's no doubt Asians came over Alaska-Russia (Beringia); but I think there's good evidence ice age Europeans came here before them too over the ice. They mixed eventually.
Pretty sure we've only found ONE "clovis" human remain, and it was a baby. We still have so much to do in the USA in terms of prehistory.
This is really the only one I ever found that could be Payseur. All the others seem to be Pope, like originally thought. This one fits because Q specifies (Church) then (P), meaning another "illuminati" family. But kek it could be Pope too.
I've always thought P = Pope (or [P], same thing), but since Q's crumb about that I keep an open mind it could be Payseur.
That's true, I think I've heard about both those things. The really confusing thing is there's evidence of settlement in PERU 14000 years ago, so not sure how they got there if they were only starting to build settlements in North America at that time.
That's literally the only thing about Payseur in all of Q's crumbs, besides the illuminati doc.
Well yea, kinda the same thing though. Q was talking about the current pope in many of the crumbs imo.
There's also clear evidence of Pope/Soros coordination.
Also this is a good vid on the Solutreans.
Don't let the title fool you, it's a canadian documentary, kek.
It was legit called "white supremacist" for even suggesting the Solutrean Hypothesis.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/21/rejecting-the-solutrean-hypothesis-the-first-peoples-in-the-americas-were-not-from-europe
A nickname to tell what baker is baking. Not namefagging, not tripfagging, just a nickname.
>Pasteur
The *Payesur family doesn't come up in any digs related to Q at all. I'm not even sure Q saw that part of the post from that anon at this point. Payseur barely fits any of the P crumbs either.
Yea, we know, but hur dur [P] isn't the same as P.
<a biblefag doesn't want to talk about the pope
Shocking. And you're late to the conversation, you missed it while you were spamming bible verse, we already discussed that redditor.
Awesome info, thanks anon. Spent a good amount of digging into primarily the European side, I know the Native American parts are so complex and expansive I started small. Got some nice new material to dig into for later.
>contributes nothing
>tries to shut down debate and discussion
Fuck off retard. Oh wait, you're the one that spams that giant graphic here and on 4pol.
K E K
E
K
Oh ok have a good night dude.